dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Education

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Education

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the proffered position of a 'teacher (self-enrichment)' qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO determined that the petitioner did not prove that a bachelor's degree in a specific field is the minimum requirement for the job, referencing the Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook which indicates similar roles do not require such a degree.

Criteria Discussed

Degree Is Normal Minimum Requirement Degree Is Common To The Industry Position Is Complex Or Unique Employer Normally Requires A Degree Duties Are Specialized And Complex

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
identifyfngdacadddedto 
prevent 24, L;.~armnted 
invasion ot pxmd privacy 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
PUBLIC COPY 
c 
S'+ 
'.""k$ ,df 
FILE: WAC 04 067 50267 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 2 7 2006 
PETITION: 
 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
WAC 04 067 50267 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The director of the service center denied the nonirnrnigrant visa petition and the matter is now 
before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be 
denied. 
The petitioner is a residential care facility that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a teacher (self-enrichment). 
The petitioner, therefore, endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonirnrnigrant worker in a specialty 
occupation pursuant to section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1 lol(a>(l5>(H>(i)(b>. 
The director denied the petition because the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. On appeal, 
counsel states that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation 
that requires: 
(A) 
 theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and 
(B) 
 attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) 
as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the 
following criteria: 
(I) 
 A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement 
for entry into the particular position; 
(2) 
 The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar 
organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is 
so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 
(3) 
 The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) 
 The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required 
to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or 
higher degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is 
directly related to the proffered position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (I) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the 
director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the 
WAC 04 067 50267 
Page 3 
director's denial letter; and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in 
its entirety before issuing its decision. 
The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as a teacher (self-enrichment). 
 Evidence of the 
beneficiary's duties includes: the Form 1-129; the attachments accompanying the Form 1-129; the petitioner's 
support letter; and the petitioner's response to the director's request for evidence. According to this evidence, 
the beneficiary would perform duties that entail educating adult residents according to their individual needs 
and abilities using simple everyday subjects and tasks, and evaluating the educational capacity of residents 
and instructing them according to their ability level. Residents may have reading instruction or simple 
lessons in arts and crafts math. Specifically, the beneficiary will prepare lesson plans and establish goals; 
demonstrate methods and procedures to residents; observe and evaluate residents' work to determine their 
progress or suggest improvements; meet with the family members of a resident; assist counseling staff in 
resolving behavior or social issues; and evaluate the educational capacity of residents. Counsel's July 28, 
2004 letter elaborated on the proposed duties. The petitioner stated that the proposed position requires a 
bachelor's degree in education or a related field. 
The director stated that the proposed position resembles a self-enrichment teacher as that occupation is 
portrayed in the Department of Labor's (DOL) Occupational Outlook Handbook (the Handbook), and that the 
Handbook conveys that this occupation does not require a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty. The 
director found the submitted three job postings unpersuasive in establishing that the proposed position 
requires a baccalaureate degree in education or a related field, and also found the proposed duties generic in 
nature, providing no detail as to the unique or complex nature of the proposed position or showing how it 
differs from similar positions within the same industry. According to the director, the petitioner submitted no 
evidence showing that the industry requires a baccalaureate degree in education or a related field for the 
proposed position. The petitioner submitted a list of former employees and their corresponding degrees and 
employment dates; however, the director found that there was no evidence to corroborate the list. The 
director discussed Defensor v. Meissner, 201 F. 3d 384, 387 (5' Cir. 2000). According to the director, the 
petitioner failed to show how the proposed position is more specialized and complex than that of a self- 
enrichment teacher, which is an occupation that does not require a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty. 
On appeal, counsel states that the beneficiary will teach basic skills and tasks to elderly residents who have 
health-related ailments and that the proposed duties involve more than the Handbook's description of a 
self-enrichment teacher. Counsel states that the proposed position is analogous to a kindergarten teacher and 
a special education teacher; and further states that the proposed position requires a baccalaureate degree 
because a kindergarten teacher and a special education teacher require a baccalaureate degree. Counsel states 
that the submitted job postings also demonstrate that the proposed position requires a baccalaureate degree. 
According to counsel, the petitioner did not submit letters from other facilities because the petitioner does not 
have access to the proprietary information of competitors, and other facilities do not offer the services of a 
self-enrichment teacher. Only a person with formal education in the field of education can teach residents 
with mental and physical disabilities and behavioral issues, counsel asserts. According to counsel, a 
kindergarten teacher, although similar to the proposed position, would lack the skills that are required for the 
proposed position. Counsel states that the proposed position is more complex than a general education 
WAC 04 067 50267 
Page 4 
teacher; but it uses knowledge of general education in teaching basic skills to Alzheimer's patients and war 
veterans. Counsel maintains that the proposed position is newly created. 
Upon review of the record, the petitioner has established none of the four criteria outlined in 8 C.F.R. 
5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Therefore, the proffered position is a specialty occupation. 
The AAO first considers the criteria at 8 C.F.R. $5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher 
degree or its equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; a degree 
requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations; or a particular 
position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. Factors often 
considered by CIS when detennining these criteria include: whether the Handbook reports that the industry 
requires a degree; whether the industry's professional association has made a degree a minimum entry 
requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from fms or individuals in the industry attest that such firms 
"routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals." See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 
(D.Minn. 1999)(quoting HirdIBlaker Corp. v. Suva, 712 F. Supp. 1095,1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). 
In determining whether a position qualifies as a specialty occupation, CIS looks beyond the title of the 
position and determines, from a review of the duties of the position and any supporting evidence, whether the 
position actually requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, 
and the attainment of a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty as the minimum for entry into the 
occupation as required by the Act. The AAO routinely consults the Handbook for its information about the 
duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. 
The Handbook discloses that the proposed duties parallel those of a self-enrichment teacher in a private 
school, and a recreation worker or an activity specialist for a nursing home. The Handbook describes a 
self-enrichment teacher as follows: 
Self-enrichment teachers provide instruction in a wide variety of subjects that students take 
for personal enrichment or self-improvement. Some teach a series of classes that provide 
students with useful life skills, such as cooking, personal finance, and time management 
classes. Others provide group instruction intended solely for recreation, such as photography, 
pottery, and painting courses. Many others provide one-on-one instruction in a variety of 
subjects, including dance, singing, or playing a musical instrument. The instruction self- 
enrichment teachers provide seldom leads to a particular degree and attendance is voluntary, 
but dedicated, talented students sometimes go on to careers in the arts. Teachers who conduct 
courses on academic subjects in a non-academic setting, such as literature, foreign language, 
and history courses, are also included in this occupation. 
Self-enrichment teachers provide instruction on a wide range of subjects, so they may have 
styles and methods of instruction that differ greatly. Most self-enrichment classes are 
relatively informal and not demanding of instructors. Some classes, such as pottery or 
sewing, may be largely hands-on, with the instructor demonstrating methods or techniques 
WAC 04 067 50267 
Page 5 
for the class, observing students as they attempt to do it themselves, and pointing out 
mistakes to students and offering suggestions to improve techniques. Other classes, such as 
those involving financial planning or religion and spirituality, may be more similar to a 
lecture in nature or rely more heavily on group discussions. . . . 
Many of the classes that self-enrichment educators teach are shorter in duration than classes 
taken for academic credit; some finish in 1 or 2 days to several weeks. These brief classes 
tend to be introductory in nature and generally focus on only one topic-for example, a 
cooking class that teaches students how to make bread. Some self-enrichment classes 
introduce children and youths to activities such as piano or drama, and may be designed to 
last anywhere from 1 week to several months. 
Many self enrichment teachers provide one-on-one lessons to students. The instructor may 
only work with the student for an hour or two a week, but direct the student what they should 
practice in the interim until their next lesson. . . . 
All self-enrichment teachers must prepare lessons beforehand and stay current in their 
fields. . . . 
The beneficiary will educate adult residents using simple everyday subjects and tasks. Residents may have 
reading instruction or simple lessons in arts and crafts and math. The beneficiary will prepare lesson plans 
and establish goals, demonstrate methods and procedures to residents, and observe and evaluate their work. 
A self-enrichment teacher prepares lessons; provides one-on-one lessons to students; and instructs in a wide 
variety of subjects such as pottery, painting, sewing, cooking, and personal finance. 
A recreation worker or an activity specialist is depicted in the Handbook as follows: 
Recreation workers hold a variety of positions at different levels of responsibility. Recreation 
leaders, who are responsible for a recreation program's daily operation, primarily organize 
and direct participants. They may lead and give instruction in dance, drama, crafts, games, 
and sports; schedule the use of facilities; keep records of equipment use; and ensure that 
recreation facilities and equipment are used properly. Workers who provide instruction and 
coach groups in specialties such as art, music, drama, swimming, or tennis may be called 
activity specialists. 
The beneficiary will provide lessons in arts and crafts. Recreation leaders and activity specialists give 
instruction in areas such as crafts and dance, and ensure that the recreation facilities and equipment are used 
properly. The Handbook conveys that 15 percent of recreation workers were employed by nursing and other 
personal care facilities. 
The Handbook conveys that a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty is not required for a self-enrichment 
teacher, a recreation worker, or an activity specialist. The Handbook states: 
WAC 04 067 50267 
Page 6 
The main qualification for self-enrichment teachers is expertise in their subject area, but 
requirements may vary greatly with both the type of class taught and the place of 
employment. In some cases, a portfolio of one's work may be required. For example, to 
secure a job teaching a photography course, an applicant would need to show examples of 
previous work. Some self-enrichment teachers are trained educators or other professionals 
who teach enrichment classes in their spare time. In many self-enrichment fields, however, 
instructors are simply experienced in the field, and want to share that experience with others. 
The Handbook does not convey that a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty is required for a recreation 
leader or an activity specialist in a nursing home; it states: 
Educational requirements for recreation workers range from a high school diploma-or 
sometimes less for those seeking many summer jobs-to graduate degrees for some 
administrative positions in large public recreation systems. Full-time career professional 
positions usually require a college degree with a major in parks and recreation or leisure 
studies, but a bachelor's degree in any liberal arts field may be sufficient for some jobs in the 
private sector. . . . 
Thus, based on the Handbook's information and the evidence in the record, the petitioner fails to establish the 
first criterion at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A): that a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is the 
normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position. 
The submitted job postings do not establish the first alternative prong at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2) - 
that a specific degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar 
organizations. None of the job postings are from employers that are similar in nature to the petitioner, a small 
residential care facility. Florida Institute for Neurologic Rehabilitation, Inc. provides rehabilitation, 
education, and vocational services to children and adult survivors of brain injury. TheraCare provides 
rehabilitative, developmental, and educational services within five boroughs of New York. Overlake Hospital 
is a hospital. Further, there is no evidence to establish that the limited number of postings in the record are 
representative of recruiting and hiring practices common to the industry. For these reasons, the job postings 
fail to establish that a specific degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among 
similar organizations. 
The petitioner has not satisfied the second alternative prong at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2) as no 
evidence in the record shows the proffered position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by 
an individual with a degree. As discussed earlier in this decision, the proposed position is a combination of 
those of a self-enrichment teacher and a recreation leader or an activity specialist in a nursing home. 
According to the Handbook, these occupations do not require a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty. 
WAC 04 067 50267 
Page 7 
No evidence in the record establishes the regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3): that the petitioner 
normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position. 
To satisfy the regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4), the petitioner must establish that the nature of 
the specific duties is so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually 
associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. The proposed duties resemble those of a 
selfenrichment teacher and recreation leader or an activity specialist, and the Handbook relates that these 
occupations do not require knowledge that is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or 
higher degree in a specific field of study. Accordingly, the petitioner fails to establish the fourth criterion at 
8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). 
As related in the discussion above, the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered position is a 
specialty occupation. Accordingly, the AAO shall not disturb the director's denial of the petition on this 
ground. 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1361. 
The petitioner has not sustained that burden. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.