dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Education
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the beneficiary had already remained in the United States in H-1B status for over six years. Pursuant to Section 214(g)(4) of the Act, the maximum period of authorized admission for an H-1B nonimmigrant is six years, and the beneficiary was therefore not entitled to an extension of stay.
Criteria Discussed
Maximum Period Of Stay
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
i %. U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 . identifjring data deleted to prevent clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy PUBLIC COPY FILE: LIN 03 167 54010 office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 3 0 2006 IN RE: PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 10 1 (a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) i ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS : <. This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to . the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Robert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office LIN 03 167 54010 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be denied. The petitioner is a school, district that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a teacher. The petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 10 1 (a)( 15)(H)(i)(b) of the Iminigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 8 1 10 1 (a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). The director denied the petition because the beneficiary had remained in the United States in H-1B status for over six years and was not entitled to an extension of stay. On appeal, counsel submits a brief asking that the H-lB status be extended. Citizenship and Immigration services (CIS) records reflect that the beneficiary granted a change of status to H-1B visa status on July 24, 1 197 '. He was thereafter employed in the United States from July 24, 1997 until August of 2003 in H-1B visa status. On April 28, 2003, the petitioner filed an H-1B petition requesting that the beneficiary be granted continued status and permitted to work from June 9,2003 until June 30,2004. Section 214(g)(4) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(g)(4), provides that "[tlhe period of authorized admission [of an H-1B nonimmigrant] may not exceed 6 years." The record indicates that the beneficiary was in approved H-1B status from July 24, 1997 until June 8,2003, and was employed in the United States in H1B status from July 24, 1997 until August of 2003, a period of more than six years. The petitioner is not, therefore, entitled to an extension of the petition, and the petition must be denied. The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied. ' The petitioner asserts that the beneficiary was in optional practical training from July 24, 1997 through June 1 1, 1998, and did not change status to H-1 B until June 1 1, 1998. The petitioner does not submit proof of the beneficiary's optional practical training during the stated time period, and the assertion conflicts with CIS records.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.