Dismissed H-1B

H-1B Dismissed โ€” Fashion: did not establish the beneficiary was eligible for an H-1B

๐Ÿ“… APR 2 6 ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Fashion

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary was eligible for an H-1B extension beyond the six-year maximum period. The petitioner claimed eligibility under the AC21 Act, which requires a labor certification to have been pending for at least 365 days. The AAO found that the labor certification was filed less than 365 days before the beneficiary's six-year limit expired, thus making him ineligible for the extension.

Criteria Discussed

H-1B Six-Year Limit (Ina 214(G)(4)) Ac21 Extension Beyond Six Years 365-Day Rule For Pending Labor Certification
๐Ÿ“„ Original decision (USCIS PDF)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft

Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.

Browse Decisions โ†’