dismissed H-1B Case: Fitness And Recreation
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the proffered position of membership sales representative/fitness trainer was not found to be a specialty occupation. The AAO determined that a bachelor's degree in a specific field is not the normal minimum requirement for entry into this occupation, referencing the Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook. The petitioner failed to prove that the degree requirement was an industry standard, that the company consistently required a degree for the role, or that the duties were sufficiently specialized and complex.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
dentifying data deleted to
prevent clearly unwarranted
!nv%cinm nb wmnraal ng-ivacv
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
20 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Rm. A3042
Washington, DC 20529
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
FILE: LIN 04 228 52769 Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: i3) 7 Zl@!
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimrnigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All materials have been returned
to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office.
Robert P. Wiemann, Director
Administrative Appeals Office
LIN 04 228 52769
Page 2
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition. The matter is now on
appeal before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be
denied.
The petitioner is a governmental parks and recreation service that also operates a fitness club. It seeks to
employ the beneficiary as a membership sales representativelfitness trainer and to classify him as a
nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b).
The director denied the petition on the ground that the proffered position does not qualify as a specialty
occupation.
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an
occupation that requires:
(A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge,
and
(B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its
equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States.
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation the position must meet one
of the following criteria:
(1) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum
requirement for entry into the particular position;
(2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among
similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its
particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an
individual with a degree;
(3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or
(4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge
required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a
baccalaureate or higher degree.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R.
5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty
that is directly related to the proffered position.
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the
director's request for evidence (RFE); (3) the petitioner's response to the RFE; (4) the director's decision;
and (5) Form I-290B and supporting materials. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before
issuing its decision.
LIN 04 228 52769
Page 3
The petitioner is a parks and recreation district of the State of North Dakota that also owns and operates
the Courts Plus Fitness Center ("fitness center"). The petitioner states that it has 330 employees, gross
annual income of $14 million, and seeks to employ the petitioner as a membership sales representative
and fitness trainer for the fitness club. According to the petitioner, the sales representative duties
comprise 75% of the job and the fitness trainer duties comprise 25% of the job.
The sales representative duties (75%) are listed by the petitioner as follows:
Provide potential members with complete information [about the fitness center], as well as
provide accurate information over the phone - 25%
-- Provide clientele with accurate information.
-- Provide continuous contact with clientele insuring all clients are serviced in a professional
and pleasant manner.
Assist in making telephone calls to clientele of [the fitness center] - 25%
-- Make daily telephone calls to prospective members.
-- Provide the opportunity for prospective members to join a quality club with quality programs.
Responsible for daily paperwork (i.e., process memberships) and calculate sales statistics and
update sales tracking board - 25%
-- Maintain and upkeep of daily membership sales information and statistics documentation in a
timely and professional manner.
-- Prepare all membership documentation and statistics in a timely and professional manner.
The fitness trainer duties of the position (25%) are listed by the petitioner as follows:
Assist the fitness director in implementing individual and group exercise programs - 10%
-- Instruction of fitness activities to clientele. Programs include activities regarding general
fitness, special populations, corporate fitness, and sport specific training.
-- Provide safe and effective fitness activities for clientele based on accepted fitness standard.
Deal with members of the public/clients in a professional and courteous manner.
Assist in making telephone calls to clientele of [fitness center] - 5%
-- Make daily telephone calls to recruit clientele to participate in various fitness programs.
-- Provide the opportunity for clientele to join a quality fitness program and discuss their
specific program needs.
Instruct and supervise clientele in the proper use of weight and cardiovascular equipment and
programs - 5%
LIN 04 228 52769
Page 4
-- Train and educate clientele in the correct use of fitness equipment and programs. Offer
assistance and changes to clientele programs, when needed or requested. Beware of potential
injuries to clients and when accidents or injuries occur, take appropriate remedial action.
-- Ensure correct and proper operations of equipment and programs as mandated through
manufacturer's recommendations, program goals and objectives, and accepted industry-wide
standards.
Assist in the maintenance of fitness area and exercise equipment - 5%
-- Assist in the daily upkeep of fitness areas and equipment.
-- Maintain a healthy and safe working environment for clientele through manufacturer's
recommended maintenance schedules and established upkeep practices of [the fitness center].
According to the petitioner, the sales representative duties of the proffered position require a
baccalaureate degree in marketing, communications, or a related field, while the fitness trainer duties
require a baccalaureate degree in exercise science or a related field.
In his decision the director found that the duties of the proffered position reflected those of a recreation
and fitness worker, as described in the Department of Labor (D0L)'s Occupational Outlook Handbook
(Handbook), and referred to information in the Handbook indicating that a bachelor's degree in a specific
specialty is not the normal minimum requirement for entry into such positions. The petitioner did not
establish that a bachelor's degree requirement is an industry-wide standard for the proffered position, the
director declared; nor did the petitioner demonstrate that it has a pattern of hiring individuals for the
position who have baccalaureate degrees in a specialized field. Lastly, the director stated that the
petitioner failed to show that the duties of the proffered position are so specialized and complex that the
knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with a baccalaureate or higher degree. The
director concluded that the proffered position did not meet any of the criteria of a specialty occupation
enumerated at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A).
On appeal the petitioner asserts that it requires all of its employees in sales and instructor positions to
have baccalaureate degrees, and that CIS has already approved a previous H-1B petition it filed for a
similar position on behalf of another beneficiary. Documentation has been submitted in support of these
assertions.
In determining whether a position meets the statutory and regulatory criteria of a specialty occupation,
CIS routinely consults the DOL Handbook, supra, as an authoritative source of information about the
duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. Factors typically considered are whether
the Handbook indicates a degree is required by the industry; whether the industry's professional
association has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from firms
or individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only degreed
individuals." See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F.Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 (D.Minn. 1999) (quoting HiraBlaker
Corp. v. Suva, 712 F.Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). CIS also analyzes the specific duties and
complexity of the position at issue, with the Handbook's occupational descriptions as a reference, as well
as the petitioner's past hiring practices for the position. See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, id., at 1165-66.
LIN 04 228 52769
Page 5
The AAO determines that the proffered position combines two occupations described in the Handbook.
The duties described by the petitioner are primarily those of a sales representative, and secondarily those
of a fitness worker. Sales representatives are described in the Handbook, in pertinent part, as follows:
. . . . Regardless of the type of product they sell, their primary duties are to interest
wholesale and retail buyers and purchasing agents in their merchandise, and to address
any of the client's questions or concerns . . . . Sales representatives spend much of their
time traveling to and visiting with prospective buyers and current clients. During a sales
call, they discuss the client's needs and suggest how their merchandise or services can
meet those needs . . . . Obtaining new accounts is an important part of the job. Sales
representatives follow leads from other clients . . . and may visit potential clients
unannounced . . . .
Handbook, 2004-05 edition, at 412. As for the educational requirements of sales representatives, the
Handbook states as follows:
The background needed for sales jobs varies by product line and market. Many
employers hire individuals with previous sales experience who do not have a college
degree, but often prefer those with some college education. Increasingly employers
prefer or require a bachelor's degree as the job requirements have become more technical
and analytical. Nevertheless, for some consumer products, factors such as sales ability,
personality, and familiarity with brands are more important than educational background
. . . . In general, companies are looking for the best and brightest individuals who have
the personality and desire to sell.
Id. at 413. The foregoing information indicates that a baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific
specialty is not the normal minimum requirement for entry into a sales representative position.
Familiarity with the product and sales experience are generally more important qualifications for a sales
representative than a baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty. Thus, a sales representative
does not qualify as a specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I).
As for fitness workers, the Handbook describes that occupation as follows:
Fitness workers instruct or coach groups or individuals in various exercise activities . . . .
Fitness trainers help clients to assess their level of physical fitness and help them to set
and reach fitness goals. They also demonstrate various exercises and help clients to
improve their exercise techniques. They may keep records of their clients' exercise
sessions in order to assess their progress towards physical fitness. Personal trainers
work with clients on a one-on-one basis in either a gym or the client's home. Aerobics
instructors conduct group exercise sessions that involve aerobic exercise, stretching, and
muscle conditioning. Some fitness workers may perform the duties of both aerobics
instructors and fitness trainers. Fitness directors oversee the operations of a health club
or fitness center. Their work involves creating and maintaining programs that meet the
needs of the club's members.
LIN 04 228 52769
1 Page 6
Id. at 393. The Handbook describes the training and educational requirements of fitness workers, in
pertinent part, as follows:
Generally, fitness trainers and aerobics instructors must obtain a certification in the
fitness field to obtain employment . . . . There are many organizations that offer
certification testing in the fitness field . . . .
An increasing number of employers require fitness workers to have a bachelor's degree
in a field related to health or fitness, such as exercise science or physical education.
Some employers allow workers to substitute a college degree for certification, while
others require both a degree and certification . . . .
Handbook, id., at 394. Thus, the Handbook indicates that a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty is
not the normal minimum requirement for entry into a fitness worker, or fitness trainer, position. While a
bachelor's degree in the health or fitness field is viewed with increasing favor by employers, it is not
routinely required for entry into the occupation. Thus, a fitness worker does not qualify as a specialty
occupation under 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(l).
Based on the foregoing analysis, the AAO determines that the proffered position - which combines the
duties of a sales representative and a fitness worker - does not meet the first alternative criterion of a
specialty occupation at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I).
As for the second alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, there is no evidence in the record that a
degree requirement in a specific specialty is common to the petitioner's industry in parallel positions
among similar organizations, as required for the proffered position to qualify as a specialty occupation
under the first prong of 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2). Nor does the record demonstrate that the
proffered position is so complex or unique that it can only be performed by an individual with a specialty
degree, as required for the position to qualify as a specialty occupation under the second prong of
8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2).
With regard to the third alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3),
the petitioner has submitted the resumes of four individuals - with baccalaureate, or baccalaureate and
master's, degrees in specific health- or fitness-related specialties - who it asserts are current employees in
similar positions to the proffered position in this case. According to the resumes, all four individuals are
in fitness trainer or related positions with no duties of a sales representative nature. Since sales
representative duties represent 75% of the proffered position and fitness trainer duties just 25%, it does
not appear that any of those four individuals occupies a position similar to the membership sales
representativelfitness trainer position proffered to the beneficiary. Moreover, while the petitioner
indicates that it has 330 employees, there is no evidence in the record of how many of those employees
are in its fitness staff and whether the four individuals whose resumes have been submitted comprise a
majority of the fitness staff. Without evidence of the size of the petitioner's fitness staff and the
percentage of the staff that the four employees with fitness-related degrees represent, the resumes in the
record are not persuasive evidence that the petitioner normally requires a baccalaureate or higher degree
or its equivalent for the proffered position, as required for it to qualify as a specialty occupation under
8 C.F.R. 5 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3).
LIN 04 228 52769
I Page 7
The petitioner has also submitted an H-1B approval notice for one of the resume individuals. As
discussed above, however, there is no corroborating evidence showing that the position is similar to the
membership sales representativelfitness trainer position at issue in this petition. Furthermore, one
employee with a specialty degree does not establish that the petitioner normally hires only degreed
individuals. Thus, the previous H-1B approval does not demonstrate that the petitioner normally requires
a specialty degree or its equivalent for the proffered position, as required for it to qualify as a specialty
occupation under 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3). The AAO also notes that each nonirnmigrant petition
is a separate proceeding with a separate record. See 8 C.F.R. 3 103.8(d). In making a determination of
statutory eligibility, CIS is limited to the information contained in the petitioner's record of proceeding.
See 8 C.F.R. 5 103.2 (b)(l6)(ii). Moreover, the AAO is never bound by a decision issued by a service
center or a district director. See Louisiana Philharmonic Orchestra v. INS, 2000 WL 282785 (E.D. La.),
affd 248 F.3d 1139 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S.Ct. 51 (2001). Therefore, the previous H-1B
approval for a different employee of the petitioner has no legal bearing on the current H-1B petition, and
provides no guideline for the AAO's adjudication of the instant appeal.
Lastly, the proffered position does not meet the fourth alternative criterion of a specialty occupation, at
8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4), because the record does not establish that the duties are so specialized
and complex that they require knowledge usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or
higher degree in a specific specialty. The petitioner has not demonstrated that the duties of the proffered
position exceed the scope of a typical sales representative andlor fitness trainer, neither of which is an
occupation that ordinarily requires baccalaureate level knowledge in a specific specialty.
For the reasons discussed above, the proffered position does not qualify as a specialty occupation under
any of the criteria enumerated in 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). The petitioner has not established that
the beneficiary will be coming temporarily to the United States to perform services in a specialty
occupation, as required under section 101 (a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)( 15)(H)(i)(b).
The petitioner bears the burden of proof in these proceedings. See section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1361.
The petitioner has not sustained that burden. Accordingly, the AAO will not disturb the director's decision
denying the petition.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied. Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.