dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Graphic Design
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the Director correctly followed the 'revocation on notice' procedure after discovering the beneficiary was no longer employed by the petitioner. The petitioner admitted the beneficiary's employment had ceased but failed to respond to the Notice of Intent to Revoke (NOIR), thus failing to overcome the grounds for revocation.
Criteria Discussed
Revocation On Notice Cessation Of Employment Withdrawal Of Petition
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF B-L-, INC. Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: MAR. 28,2016 APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, a beauty product company, filed the petition in order to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "graphic designer" under the H -1 B nonimmigrant classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act § 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-1B program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director, Vermont Service Center, revoked the approval of the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon de novo review, we will dismiss the appeal. I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK The regulations provide for two methods for revoking an H -1 B pet1t10n: (1) immediate and automatic revocation; and (2) revocation on notice. 8 C.F .R. § 214.2(h)(11 ). More specifically: • The approval of a petition is "immediately and automatically" revoked if a petitioner files a written withdrawal of the petition. 8 C.F .R. § 214.2(h)(11 )(ii). • The director shall follow the "revocation on notice" process by sending the petitioner a NOIR if it is determined that the beneficiary is no longer employed in the capacity specified in the petition. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(ll)(iii). The notice shall contain a detailed statement of the grounds for revocation and the time period allowed to respond. Id. II. FACTUALBACKGROUND A site visit was conducted at the Petitioner's business operations on November 13, 2013. Thereafter, the officer conducting the site visit sent the Petitioner an email requesting additional information. The Petitioner responded to the email on December 13, 2013, indicating that the Beneficiary's employment had ceased on November 15, 2013. Matter of B-L-, INC Thereafter, the Director sent a NOIR to the Petitioner, stating that USCIS had learned that the Beneficiary was no longer employed by the Petitioner. The Director requested that the Petitioner submit a written request to withdraw the petition. The Petitioner did not respond to the notice, and the Director revoked the petition. III. DISCUSSION On appeal, the Petitioner states the following: On December 13, the USCIS emailed our company and we informed the USCIS that [the Beneficiary] was no longer an employee of [the Petitioner]. Because we informed the USCIS by email that [the Beneficiary] was no longer an employee ... we did not think it was necessary to write another letter withdrawing the H-1B petition . . . . Because we are in compliance with the requirement to notify the USCIS that [the Beneficiary] was no longer employed by our company, we respectfully request that the H -1 B petition not be considered revoked. We request that it be withdrawn. The Petitioner acknowledges that it did not withdraw the H-1B petition. Notably, even if the Petitioner had submitted a withdrawal request, such notification would have resulted in the automatic revocation of the petition's approval (rather than the "revocation on notice" process that occurred in the instant case). 1 The Petitioner did not withdraw the petition, and there is no indication: (1) that the Director improperly followed the "revocation on notice" process; or (2) that the Director's decision was incorrect. Therefore, the appeal will be dismissed. III. CONCLUSION In visa petition proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration benefit sought. Section 291 ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361; Matter ofOtiende, 26 I&N Dec. 127, 128 (BIA 2013) (citing Matter of Brantigan, 11 I&N Dec. 493, 495 (BIA 1966)). Here, that burden has not been met. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. Cite as Matter o.fB-L-, Inc., ID# 16413 (AAO Mar. 28, 2016) 1 A request to withdraw an H-1 B petition results in the revocation ofthe petition. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(ll)(ii). Automatic revocations are not appealable. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(l2)(ii). 2
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.