dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate it had sufficient specialty occupation work for the beneficiary for the entire requested period. The AAO found that the petitioner did not describe the position's duties with sufficient detail and consistency, and failed to establish that the proposed duties were so specialized and complex as to require a bachelor's degree in a specific field.
Criteria Discussed
Normal Degree Requirement For The Position Industry Standard Degree Requirement Or Position Is Complex/Unique Employer'S Normal Degree Requirement Specialized And Complex Duties Requiring A Degree
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF M-C- CORP. APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: DEC. 23,2016 PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, an information technology company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneticiary as a "business analyst" under the H-1 B nonimmigrant classitication for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-1B program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualitied foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized kn9wledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director, Vermont Service Center, denied the petition. The Director concluded that the evidence of record does not establish that the Petitioner had specialty occupation work available for the Beneficiary when the petition was filed and for the entirety of the intended employment period. The matter is now before us on appeal. In its appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the Director erred in her findings. Upon de novo review, we will dismiss the appeal. I. LAW Section 214(i)(J) of the Act, 8 U .S.C. § 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: (A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and (B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(ii) largely restates this statutory definition, but adds a non-exhaustive list of fields of endeavor. In addition, the regulations provide that the proffered position must meet one of the following criteria to qualify as a specialty occupation: Matter of M-C- Corp. (1) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; (2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its ( particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; (3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or ( 4) The nature of the specific duties [is] so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. 8 C.P.R.§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has consistently interpreted the term "degree" in the criteria at S C.P.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a speJ:ific specialty that is directly related to the proposed position. See Royal Siam Corp. v. Cherto.ff, 484 iF.3d 139, 147 (1st Cir. 2007) (describing "a degree r~quirement in a specific specialty" as "one that relates directly to the duties and responsibilities of a particular position"); Defensor v. Meissner, 201 F.3d 384, 387 (5th Cir. 2000). II. PROFFERED POSITION The Petitioner stated that the Beneficiary will work on building a web centric platform to connect students to U.S. corporations for potential employment. The Petitioner listed the Beneficiary's day-to-day duties as follows: • Plan, build and launch a new Web application and portal for a statiup company founded by successful entrepreneurs[.] • Understand the business case, project goals, strategies, project charter, timelines and stake holders[.] • Plan, Discover, Define, Design, Develop, Deploy a static Website (in phase 1) followed by a Dynamic transaction oriented Website (in phase 2). The design, develop and build activities will be outsourced, while plan, define, document & deploy will be managed by the Business Analyst role. • Gather, document and analyze requirements from various stake holders and various sources of information. • Build Business (BRD) & Functional requirements documents (FRD) documents. Build the website work flow & web content. Using MS Visio, MS Words, MS Excel, and MS PPT. • Document the requirements and procedure in excellent manner. 2 Matter of M-C- Corp. • Participate in selection of an external agency to design, develop and deploy the website. Get the website designed, content validated and uploaded with the help of external agency. Conduct user acceptance test to approve the end product. • Work independently and possess good team/people skills. Will report into a Program Manager who will provide initial training/orientation, ongoing mentoring and coaching to accomplish the job. The Petitioner stated that its requirement for this position "is a minimum of a Bachelor's Degree in Computer Science or Engineering with MBA or its equivalent in education or work experience." III. ANALYSIS Upon review of the record in its totality and for the reasons set out below, we determine that the Petitioner has not demonstrated that it would employ the Beneficiary in a specialty occupation. Specifically, the record does not (1) describe the position's duties with sufficient consistent detail; and (2) establish that the job duties require an educational background, or its equivalent, commensurate with a specialty occupation. 1 For H-1 B approval, the Petitioner must demonstrate a legitimate need for an employee exists and substantiate that it has H-1 B caliber work for the Beneficiary for the entire period of employment requested in the petition. It is incumbent upon the Petitioner to demonstrate it has sufficient work to require the services of a person with at least a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, to perform duties at a level that requires the theoretical and practical application of at least a bachelor's degree level of a body of highly specialized knowledge in a specific specialty for the period specified in the petition. In this matter, the Petitioner indicated that the Beneficiary would work on a specific in-house website project to facilitate international master's degree students' transition from campus to the corporate world. In response to the Director's request for evidence (RFE) the Petitioner explained that the Beneficiary "will develop an application that allow[ s] people to do specific tasks on the [P]etitioner's website," and "[t]herefore his job is that of a software developer." The Petitioner identified its planned scope and activity as discovering, designing, building, testing, deploying, and managing websites/portals and then marketing, selling, signing up, providing service, billing, and collecting money. The Petitioner further identified four different websites and the proposed stages for building the websites. The. Petitioner noted that its two founders do not draw a salary but perform work for the company and that it also employed outside vendors to design, develop, and test the websites. The Petitioner's organizational chart shows the two founders and the Petitioner's outside vendors. Additionally, the Petitioner submits invoices and other evidence to demonstrate that it has paid the outside vendors. 1 The Petitioner submitted documentation to support the H-1 B petition, including evidence regarding the proffered position and its business operations. While we may not discuss every document submitted, we have reviewed and considered each one. 3 Matter of M-C- Corp. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the business analyst's role will be spread over five years without a break and then repeats the duties of the position initially submitted. The Petitioner reiterates that although the position is titled "business analyst," the specific duties of the job are the duties of a software developer, applications, as that occupation is described in the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook). On the labor condition application (LCAi submitted in support of the H-1 8 petition, the Petitioner designated the proffered position under the occupational category "Software Developers, Applications" corresponding to the Standard Occupational Classification code 15-1132.3 The Petitioner also submits three screens hots of a portal and 150 plus pages ofportal code it claims the Beneficiary developed. 4 Also on appeal, the Petitioner references the Director's acknmvledgment in her decision that a business analyst position is traditionally considered a specialty occupation. However, we withdraw the Director's conclusory statement in this regard, as a business analyst position is not an occupation with standardized duties but rather may incorporate the duties of one or more occupations, which may or may not require a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty. We emphasize here that USCIS does not simply rely on a position's title. Rather the specific duties of the proffered position, combined with the nature of the petitioning entity's business operations, are factors to be considered. USCIS must examine the ultimate employment of the individual, and determine whether the position qualifies as a specialty occupation. See generally Defensor v. A1eis:mer, 201 F. 3d 384. Upon review of the description of the Petitioner's business analyst position and the nature of the Petitioner's startup business, we find that the duties are described in terms of generalized and generic functions. For example, the Petitioner states that its business analyst will "[p ]Ian build and launch a new Web application and portal," "[ u ]nderstand the business case, project goals, strategies, project charter, timelines and stake holders," and "Plan, Discover, Define, Design, Develop, Deploy a static Website (in phase 1) followed by a Dynamic transaction oriented Website (in phase 2)." We cannot 2 The Petitioner is required to submit a certified LCA to USCIS to demonstrate that it will pay an H-1 B worker the higher of either the prevailing wage for the occupational classification in the "area of employment" or the actual wage paid by the employer to other employees with similar experience and qualifications who are performing the same services. See Matter ofSimeio Solutions, LLC, 26 I&N Dec. 542, 545-546 (AAO 20 15). ~ The Petitioner designated the proffered position under the occupational category "Software Developer, Applications" corresponding to the Standard Occupational Classification code 15-1 132, at a Level I wage (the lowest of four assignable wage levels). The "Prevailing Wage Determination Policy Guidance" issued by the DOL provides a description of the wage levels. A Level I wage rate is generally appropriate for positions for which the Petitioner expects the Beneficiary to have a basic understanding of the occupation. This wage rate indicates: ( 1) that the Beneficiary will be expected to perform routine tasks that require limited, if any, exercise of judgment; (2) that he will be closely supervised and his work closely monitored and reviewed for accuracy; and (3) that he will receive specific instructions on required tasks and expected results. U.S. Dep't of Labor, Emp't & Training Admin., Prevailing Wage Determination Poli(v Guidance, Nonagric. Immigration Programs (rev. Nov. 2009), available at http://flcdatacenter.com/download/NPWHC_Guidance_Revised_l1_2009.pdf A prevailing wage determination starts with an entry level wage and progresses to a higher wage level after considering the experience, education, and skill requirements of the Petitioner's job opportunity. /d. 4 The Beneficiary was in F -1 student status when the petition was tiled. 4 Matter of M-C- Corp. ascertain from this general description what specific tasks the Petitioner expects of the Beneficiary in this role. It is not clear from this description whether the Beneficiary will perform the duties of a computer programmer, a web developer, a software developer, applications, or will provide other duties regarding the website portals and applications. 5 These statements do not provide any insight into the Beneficiary's actual duties or the specific tasks the Beneficiary will perform. The Petitioner has not sufficiently established the nature and scope of the Beneficiary's duties. Additionally, creating and testing applications for a website which appears to be the Petitioner's primary goal when considering the nature of its business, is a duty that falls within the occupation of a web developer. Also as the Petitioner references the Beneficiary's past coding for one of the projects for its website, it appears that the Petitioner may also rely on the Beneficiary to spend a portion of his time performing the duties of a computer programmer. Again, however, as the Petitioner has not established any definite distinctions among the duties it describes. and has provided at best an overview of the duties of the proffered position, we cannot ascertain the actual duties the Petitioner expects the Beneficiary to perform. Moreover, the Petitioner does not identify the percentage of time the Beneficiary will spend on any of the even generally described duties. Thus, we cannot ascertain the primary focus of the Beneficiary's work. We note that anything beyond incidental duties, that is the Beneficiary's predictable, recurring, and substantive job responsibilities, must be specialty occupation duties or the proffered position as a whole cannot be approved as ~ specialty occupation. We also note that although the Petitioner claims that one of its two founders \viii be a program manager and will provide ongoing mentoring and coaching and that it will outsource portions of the design and development and build activities to an external company, the Petitioner has not sufficiently and consistently divided the duties among the Beneficiary, the external company, and the program manager so that we may analyze even the general parameters of the actual tasks and the Beneficiary's actual level of responsibility. For example, the Petitioner states that the design, development, and build activities of its projects \Vill be outsourced while its business analyst will manage the planning, definition, documentation, and deployment. However, the Petitioner later states that the business analyst will "[p ]articipate in selection of an external agency to design, develop and deploy the website." In the second statement it appears an external agency will deploy the website. Further, the Petitioner states that the Beneficiary will work independently but that he will also require mentoring and coaching by the program manager. We note here that if the Beneficiary will primarily work independently, such work would require a higher wage than the Level I wage 5 For additional information on the occupation of "Web Developers," see U.S. Dep't of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 ed., "Web Developers," https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and information-technology/web-developers.htm#tab-2 (last visited Dec. 14, 20 16). For additional information on the occupation of "Computer Programmers," see U.1S. Dep't of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 ed., "Computer Programmers," https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information technology/computer-programmers.htm#tab-2 (last visited Dec. 14, 20 16). 5 Matter of M-C- Corp. designated on the LCA submitted with the petition. In designating the proffered position at a Level I, entry-level wage rate, the Petitioner has indicated that the proffered position is a comparatively low, entry-level position relative to others within an occupation and that the tasks performed require limited, if any exercise of judgement, and that the individual performing the task will be closely supervised and the work closely monitored. The Petitioner's designation of the proffered position as a Level I, entry-level position thus undermines the Petitioner's claims regarding the duties of the proffered position, such as managing the planning, definition, documentation, and deployment of the website(s) and working independently. The Petitioner did not provide an explanation for these variances. Accordingly, it is not clear who is responsible for performing the duties of deploying the websites and whether the Beneficiary will work independently or will be closely supervised. "[l]t is incumbent upon the petitioner to resolve the inconsistencies by independent objective evidence." Matter of Ho, 19 I&N Dec. 582, 591 (BIA 1988). Any attempt to explain or reconcile such inconsistencies will not suffice unless the petitioner submits competent objective evidence pointing to where the truth lies. !d. at 591-92. Finally, we do not find that the general duties described correspond to the duties of a software developer, applications, as designated on the LCA submitted in support of the petition. We recognize the Handbook as an authoritative source on the duties and educational requirements of the wide variety of occupations that it addresses. 6 In that regard, we reviewed the chapter of the Handbook entitled "Software Developers," but did not find that the duties of the proffered position correspond to this occupational classification. As noted above, the Petitioner's description of the proffered position does not inc\ude sufficient information regarding the day-to-day tasks of the position and do not delineate the actual work that the Beneficiary will perform. Nevertheless, we considered the Petitioner's claim that the Beneficiary will "[p ]lan, build and launch a new Web application and portal for a startup company" and "will develop an application that allow[s] people to do specific tasks on the [P]etitioner's website" and that these tasks fall within the parameters of the Handbook's report on the occupation of a software developer. The Petitioner points specifically to the Handbook's preamble for this occupation as support for its conclusion that the proffered position is a software developer position. The preamble states: Software developers are the creative minds behind computer programs. Some develop the applications that allow people to do specific tasks on a computer or another device. Others develop the underlying systems that run the devices or that control networks. 6 All of our references are to the 2016-2017 edition of the Handbook, which may be accessed at the Internet site http://www.bls.gov/ooh/. We do not, however, maintain that the Handbook is the exclusive source of relevant information. That is, the occupational category designated by the Petitioner is considered as an aspect in establishing the general tasks and responsibilities of a proffered position, and USCIS regularly reviews the Handbook on the duties and educational requirements of the wide variety of occupations that it addresses. 6 Matter of M-C- Corp. See U.S. Dep't of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook. 2016-17 ed., "Software Developers," https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/software developers.htm#tab-2 (last visited Dec. 14, 20 16). However, this open-ended, amorphous description does not include the necessary detailed information to establish what duties the Petitioner's business analyst will actually perform in relation to its business interests. A petitioner's unsupported statements are of very limited weight and normally will be insufficient to carry its burden of proof. See Matter ql Sqffici, 22 I&N Dec. 158, 165 (Comm'r 1998) (citing Matter ql Treasure Craft of Cal., 14 I&N Dec. 190 (Reg'l Comm'r 1972)); see also Matter of Chawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 376 (AAO 201 0). The Petitioner must support its assertions with relevant, probative, and credible evidence. See Matter ol Chawathe, 25 I&N Dec. at 376. Moreover, the Petitioner has not distinguished the generally described duties from the duties of a front-end web developer who also creates the site's layout and integrates graphics, applications, and other content, as well as writing web-design programs in a variety of computer languages. 7 See U.S. Dep't of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook. 2016-17 ed., "Web Developers," https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information technology/web-developers.htm#tab-2 (last visited Dec. 14, 20 16). As discussed above, the Petitioner has not adequately and consistently defined the Beneficiary's tasks, has not consistently identified the Beneficiary's level of responsibility, and has not provided sufficient information allocating specific programming, developing, managing, and deploying duties between the Beneficiary and external vendors. The Petitioner has not detailed the actual work to be performed rather than generally describing portions of an occupation. To reiterate, the Petitioner indicates on the charts outlining the phases of the proposed websites that an external vendor will design, develop, and test the websites while its business analyst will be limited to gathering and documenting requirements, communicating with stakeholders and testing user acceptance. Again, however, the Petitioner does not sufficiently elaborate on these duties. The Petitioner does not provide sufficient information specific to the claimed project(s) which clearly identifies the Beneficiary's role in the project or other evidence which identifies the Beneficiary's specific day-to-day duties as they relate to the project(s). The duties of the proffered position, to the extent that they are depicted in the record of proceeding, indicate that the Beneficiary may perform a few general tasks in common with the software developer, applications occupational group, but not that the Beneficiary's duties would constitute a software developer position. 7 According to the Handbook. "[e]ducational requirements for web developers vary with the setting they work in and the type of work they do. Requirements range from a high school diploma to a bachelor's degree. An associate's degree in web design or related field is the most common requirement." See U.S. Dep't of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 ed., "Web Developers," https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information technology/web-developers.htm#tab-4 (last visited Dec. 14, 2016). Additionally, we note that the education for an entry-level computer programmer position varies may require only an associate's degree. See U.S. Dep't of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2016-17 ed., "Computer Programmers,'' https://www. b ls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-techno logy/computer-prograrnmers.htm#tab-4 (last visited Dec. 14, 2016). 7 Matter of M-C- Corp. Upon review, the Petitioner's statements do not convey pertinent details of the actual work involved in these tasks. The Petitioner does not explain the Beneficiary's specific role and how it expects his work to be conducted within the scope of the Petitioner's business operations. To the extent they are described, the proposed duties do not convey the substantive tnatters that would engage the Beneficiary on a day-to-day basis. Without a meaningful job description, the record lacks evidence sufficiently concrete and informative to demonstrate that the proffered position requires a bachelor's degree, or higher, in a specific specialty, or its equivalent. This lack of probative evidence therefore precludes a finding that the proffered position satisfies any criterion at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), because it is the substantive nature of that work that determines (1) the normal minimum educational requirement for entry into the particular position, which is the focus of criterion I; (2) industry positions which are parallel to the proffered position and thus appropriate for review for a common degree requirement, under the first alternate prong of criterion 2; (3) the level of complexity or uniqueness of the proffered position, which is the focus of the second alternate prong of criterion 2; (4) the factual justification for a petitioner normally requiring a degree or its equivalent, when that is an issue under criterion 3; and (5) the degree of specialization and complexity of the specific duties, which is the focus of criterion 4. The Petitioner did not provide sufficient information to demonstrate how the performance of the duties, as described in the record, would require the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent. Such generalized descriptions do not establish a correlation between the proffered position and a need for a particular level of education, or educational equivalency, in a body of highly specialized knowledge in a specific specialty. Accordingly, as the Petitioner has not established that it has satisfied any of the criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), it cannot be found that the proffered position qualities for classification as a specialty occupation. The appeal will be dismissed and the petition denied for this reason. IV. CONCLUSION The burden is on the Petitioner to show eligibility for the immigration benefit sought. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361; Matter o.fOtiende, 26 I&N Dec. 127,128 (BIA 2013). Here, that burd.en has not been met. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. Cite as Matter o.fM-C- Corp., ID# 124376 (AAO Dec. 23, 2016) 8
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.