Dismissed
H-1B
H-1B Dismissed — Information Technology (2020): did not establish sufficient evidence to establish the
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish the specific services the beneficiary would perform during the intended period of employment. The submitted staff augmentation agreement and work order were too general, did not sufficiently describe the work, identify a specific project or client, or cover the entire requested period, making it impossible to determine if the position qualified as a specialty occupation.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Definition Services To Be Performed 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A) Criterion 1 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A) Criterion 2 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A) Criterion 3 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A) Criterion 4
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →