dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Information Technology

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed as moot because the petitioner had filed a separate, new H-1B petition for the same beneficiary, which was approved. Since the beneficiary was already granted the requested H-1B status through the new petition, further pursuit of the appeal for the revoked petition was unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

Mootness Material Change In Employment Labor Condition Application (Lca)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
(b)(6)
DATE: 
IN RE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
PETITION RECEIPT #: 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Imm igration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10l(a)( l5)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 110l (a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
Enclosed is the non-precedent decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) for your case. 
If you believe we incorrectly decided your case, you may file a motion requesting us to reconsider our 
decision and/or reopen the proceeding. The requirements for motions are located at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5. 
Motions must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) within 33 days of the date of this 
The Form I-290B web page (www .uscis.gov/i-290b) contains the latest information on fee, filing 
,CJY�9Uil.&r.,.�q[utr·emtents. Please do not mail any motions directly to the AAO. 
www .uscis.gov 
(b)(6)
NON-PRECEDENT DECISION 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, California Service Center, initially approved the nonimmigrant visa 
petition. Upon subsequent review of the record, the Director issued a notice of intent to revoke 
(NOIR) the approval of the petition, and ultimately did revoke the approval of the petition. The 
matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be 
dismissed as the matter is now moot. 
ANALYSIS 
The petitioner submitted a Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (Form I-129) to the California 
Service Center. In the Form I-129 petition, the petitioner describes itself as an information 
technology provider that was established in In order to employ the beneficiary in what it 
designated as a programm er analyst position, the petitioner sought to classify him as a nonimmigrant 
worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). 
The petition was initially granted. Thereafter, the Director reviewed the record and issued a NOIR. 
The NOIR contained a detailed statement regarding the new information that U.S. Citizenship and 
Immigration Services (USCIS) had obtained and notified the petitioner that it was afforded an 
opportunity to submit evidence in support of the petition and in opposition to the grounds alleged for 
revocation of the approval of the petition. The petitioner submitted a response. The Director 
reviewed the response and, on September 17, 2014, the Director revoked the approval of the petition. 
Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an appeal of the decision. 
A review of US CIS records indicates that on a date subsequent to the denial of the instant petition, 
the petitioner submitted a new Form I-129 petition on behalf of the beneficiary. USCIS records 
further indicate that this new petition was approved.1 Because the beneficiary in the instant petition 
has been approved for H-lB employment with the petitioner based upon the filing of another 
petition, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot.2 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
1 The petition was filed on April 11, 2014 and was approved for a period from May 20, 2014 to November 24, 
2015. 
2 As the matter is moot, we will not discuss the grounds for the revocation and appeal other than to note that a 
change in the place of employment of a beneficiary to a geographical area requiring a corresponding Labor 
Condition Application (LCA) be certified to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (USCIS) with respect 
to that beneficiary may affect eligibility for H-1B status and is, therefore, a material change for purposes of 
8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(2)(i)(E) and (l l )(i)(A). Matter of Simeio Solutions, 26 I&N Dec. 542 (AAO 2015). 
When there is a material change in the terms and conditions of employment, the petitioner must file an 
amended or new H-l B petition with the corresponding LCA. Id. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.