dismissed H-1B Case: Information Technology

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF T-C-, INC. 
APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: NOV. 10,2015 
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FORA NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, an IT consulting business, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a programmer analyst 
and classify her as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant. See section 
101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 
§ 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The Director, Vermont Service Center, revoked the petition. The matter is 
now before us on appeal. The appeal will be summarily dismissed. 
The Petitioner submitted the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, and marked box "c" at "Part 
3. Information About the Appeal or Motion" to indicate that no supplemental brief and/or additional 
evidence will be submitted. With the appeal, the Petitioner submitted a letter stating, "Please note, 
no brief and/or additional evidence is being submitted with this appeal." Accordingly, the record of 
proceeding is deemed complete as currently constituted. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v) states in pertinent part: "An officer to whom an appeal is 
taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically any 
erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal." In the instant case, the Petitioner 
has not specifically identified any erroneous conclusion of law or a statement of fact as a basis for 
the appeal; thus, the appeal is summarily dismissed. 1 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. §103.3(a)(l)(v). 
Cite as Matter ofT-C-, Inc., ID# 14415 (AAO Nov. 10, 2015) 
1 We further note that according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USC IS) records, on March 4, 2015, 
subsequent to the denial of the instant petition, another employer filed the Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant 
Worker, seeking nonimmigrant H-I B classification on behalf ofthe Beneficiary. USC IS records further indicate that this 
other employer's petition was approved on June II, 2015. Because the Beneficiary in the instant petition has been 
approved for H-1 B employment with another petitioner, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. 
As the appeal will be summarily dismissed, we will not discuss any additional deficiencies we observe in the record of 
proceeding.