dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: It Services

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ It Services

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the Petitioner failed to submit a brief or additional evidence identifying any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision. This is a procedural requirement for an appeal.

Criteria Discussed

Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Fact 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(A)(1)(V)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF V-ITS- INC. 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: AUG. 16.2017 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, an IT services and staffing firm, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a "'programmer 
analyst" under the H-1 B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. S'ee section 
10l(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. ~ 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). 
The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on 
appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(1)(v). 
On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically 
identities an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-2908. Notice of 
Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of filing. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. 
Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of 
fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ~ 1 03.3(a)(l )(v). 
Cite as Matter qfV-ITS-lnc., ID# 582798 (AAO Aug. 16, 2017) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.