dismissed H-1B Case: Market Research
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the proffered position of a market research analyst qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO determined that a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty is not the normal minimum requirement for entry into the occupation, nor is it a common requirement in the industry for similar positions. The petitioner also failed to demonstrate that the duties were uniquely complex or specialized enough to necessitate a degree.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identigin8 data deleted to prevent clearly unwarranted invasion of pemml privacy i' PUBLIC COPY U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: WAC 04 089 50646 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 3 0 2006 PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 l(a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Robert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office WAC 04 089 50646 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition. The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) summarily dismissed a subsequent appeal, finding that no additional evidence was received in support of the appeal. The matter is again before the AAO on a motion to reopen or reconsider. On motion, counsel asserts that the AAO improperly dismissed the appeal, as the Form I-290B stated a specific,reason how the director made an erroneous conclusion of law or statement in fact in denying the petition. Counsel additionally asserts that a brief was timely filed and submits FedEx tracking information as evidence. The motion will be granted. The previous decision shall be affirmed. The petition will be denied. The petitioner is an importer, wholesaler, and converter of fabric that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a full-time market research analyst. The petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to 5 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). The director denied the petition because the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. On motion, counsel submits a brief. Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: (A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and (B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the following criteria: (I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; (2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; (3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or (4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the proffered position. The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the WAC 04 089 50646 Page 3 director's denial letter; (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation; (6) the AAO's summary dismissal; and (7) the petitioner's motion to reconsider. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before issuing its decision. The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as a full-time market research analyst. Evidence of the beneficiary's duties includes: the 1-129 petition; the petitioner's February 6, 2004 letter in support of the petition; and the petitioner's response to the director's request for evidence. According to this evidence, the beneficiary, under the direct supervision of the petitioner's sales and marketing manager, would perform duties that entail: researching market conditions throughout the United States and other countries to determine the potential for increased sales of the petitioner's products and services; establishing research methodologies and designing formats, such as surveys, opinion polls, and questionnaires to assess consumer preferences and to forecast future marketing trends; gathering data on competitors' prices, sales, and methods of marketing and distribution; and preparing reports and graphic illustrations of findings. The petitioner indicated that the beneficiary is a qualified candidate for the job because he possesses the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in business administration. The director found that the proffered position, which entails duties related to a sales representative, was not a specialty occupation. Citing to the Department of Labor's (DOL) Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook), 2004-2005 edition, the director noted that the minimum requirement for entry into the position was not a baccalaureate degree or its equivalent in a specific specialty. The director found further that the petitioner failed to establish any of the criteria found at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). On motion, counsel states, in part, that the proffered position, which entails collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data on the textile and fashion market, is that of a market research analyst. Counsel states further that the record contains job advertisements from local competitors to show that this requirement is industry wide. Counsel also states that the nature of the proposed duties is so complex as to require a bachelor's degree. Upon review of the record, the petitioner has established none of the four criteria outlined in 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Therefore, the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. The AAO turns first to the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; a degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations; or a particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. Factors often considered by CIS when determining these criteria include: whether the Handbook reports that the industry requires a degree; whether the industry's professional association has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from firms or individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals." See Shanti, Znc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 (D. Minn. 1999)(quoting HirdIBlaker Corp. v. Suva, 712 F. Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). The AAO routinely consults the Handbook for its information about the duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. The AAO concurs with counsel that the proffered position is that of a market research WAC 04 089 50646 Page 4 indicate that a bachelor's degree in a specialty is required for a market research analyst position.' As the market research analyst does not require.a degree in a specialty, the position does not satisfy the regulatory requirement for eligibility as a specialty occupation under the first criterion. Regarding parallel positions in the petitioner's industry, the petitioner submitted Internet job postings for market research analysts. A review of the job postings finds that a wide range of educational backgrounds is suitable for entry into marketing analyst jobs, such as business, computer science, social science, and psychology. Further, some of the advertisements did not specify a bachelor's degree in a specialty, thereby confirming the position of the DOL in its Handbook, namely that a market research analyst position does not require a bachelor's degree in a specialty. The record also does not include any evidence from firms, individuals, or professional associations regarding an industry standard, or documentation to support the complexity or uniqueness of the proffered position. The petitioner, therefore, has not established the criteria set forth at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(l) or (2). The AAO now turns to the criterion at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3) - the employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position. As counsel does not address this issue on motion, it will not be discussed further. The evidence of record does not establish this criterion. Finally, the AAO turns to the criterion at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4) - the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. To the extent that they are depicted in the record, the duties do not appear so specialized and complex as to require the highly specialized knowledge associated with a baccalaureate or higher degree, or its equivalent, in a specific specialty. Therefore, the evidence does not establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). As related in the discussion above, the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Accordingly, the AAO shall not disturb the director's denial of the petition. The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1361. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. ORDER: The previous 'decision of the AAO, dated September 9,2004, is affied. The petition is denied. 1 A review of the website of Marketing Research Association (MRA) at http://www.mra- net.org/edeventslcnuide2.cfm#3 finds that a wide variety of degrees are acceptable for entry into the industry' including liberal arts, social science, and communications.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.