dismissed H-1B Case: Marketing
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, a telemarketing company, failed to establish that the proffered position of a marketing manager qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO consulted the Occupational Outlook Handbook and determined that a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty is not the normal minimum requirement for entry into such a position. The petitioner provided no evidence to support its claims that a degree is common in the industry or that the duties were sufficiently specialized and complex to necessitate a degree.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security $ . 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 i ,identifying data U.S. Citizenship prevent clearly unwmant4 and Immigration invasicn of &xz3omf pivaoy PUBLIC COPY FILE: SRC 04 133 5 1938 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 3 Q 2006 PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: SELF-REPRESENTED INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Robert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office SRC 04 133 51938 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be denied. The petitioner is a telemarketing company that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a marketing manager. The petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 101 (a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 9 1 101(a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b). \ The director denied the petition because the proffered position does not quali~ as a specialty occupation. On appeal, the petitioner submits a brief stating that the offered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. The issue to be discussed in this proceeding is whether the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. Section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 9 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b), provides, in part, for the classification of qualified nonimmigrant aliens who are coming temporarily to the United States to perform services in a specialty occupation. Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1184(i)(l), defines the ten;? "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: (A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and (B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a 1 I minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. The term "specialty occupation" is further defined at 8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(4)(ii) as: [A]n occupation which requires theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge in fields of human endeavor including, but not limited to, architecture, engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, social sciences, medicine and health, education, business specialties, accounting, law, theology, and the arts, and which requires the attainment of a bachelor's degree or higher in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the following criteria: (I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; i (2) he degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 1. SRC 04 133 51938 Page 3 (3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or (4) The nature of the specific duties are so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the proffered position. The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) the Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the director's denial letter; and (5) the Form I-290B with supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before issuing its decision. The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as a marketing manager. Evidence of the beneficiary's duties includes the Form 1-129 petition with attachment and the petitioner's response to the director's request for evidence. According to this evidence the beneficiary would: > Develop the petitioner's marketing strategy; Determine the demand of products and services offered by the petitioner; Identify potential markets; Develop pricing strategies to maximize market share and customer satisfaction; P Monitor trends that indicate the need for new products; - Oversee product development; and Work with the advertising manager to promote the petitioner's products and services and attract new clients. The petitioner requires a minimum of a bachelor's degree in marketing for entry into the proffered position. Upon review of the record, the petitioner has failed to establish that a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the offered position, or that a degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations, as asserted by the petitioner. Factors often considered by CIS when determining these criteria include: whether the ~e~arkent of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook) reports that the industry requires a degree; whether an industry professional association has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from firms or individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only ,'- SRC 04 133 51938 Page 4 \ degreed individuals." See Shanti, lnc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 (D. Minn. 1999) (quoting Hird/Blaker Corp. v. Suva, 712 F. Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). \ The AAO routinely consults the Handbook for information about the duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. The duties of tk;e proffered position fall within those noted for advertising, marketing, promotions, public relations, and sales managers as described in the Handbook. The Handbook notes that a wide range of educational backgrounds is suitable for entry into the aforementioned positions, but that many employers prefer related experience plus a broad liberal arts background. Bachelor's degrees in sociology, psychology, literature, journalism, philosophy, or other subjects are suitable. Requirements will vary, however, depending on the duties of a particular position. For example, some employers prefer a bachelor's or master's degree in business administration with an emphasis in marketing, for marketing, sales, and promotion management positions. In highly technical industries such as computer and electronics manufacturing a degree in engineering or science combined with a business degree may be preferred. In public relations management positions some employers prefer a bachelor's or master's degree, in public relations or journalism. The Handbook further notes that most advertising, marketing, promotions, public relations, and sales management positions are filled by promoting experienced staff or related professional or technical personnel. Many managers are former sales representatives, purchasing agents, or promotions specialists. A baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty or its equivalent is not, therefore, the minimum requirement for entry into the position. A degree in a wide range of disciplines will suffice. The petitioner has, accordingly, failed to establish the first criterion of 8 C.F.R. fj 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). The petitioner states that a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations, and that it normally requires a degree for the position. The petitioner, however, offers no evidence in support of these assertions. Simply going on the record without supporting documentary evidence is not sufficient for purposes of meeting the burden of proof in these proceedings. Matter of SofJici, 22 I&N Dec. 158, 165 (Comm. 1998) (citing Matter of Treasure Craft of California, 14 I&N 190 (Reg. Comm. 1972)). The petitioner has failed to establish the referenced criteria at 8 C.F.R. 4 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2) or (3). The petitioner offers no evidence to establish that it normally requires a degree or its equivalent for entry into the proffered position. The petitioner has, therefore, failed to establish the criterion at 8 C.F.R. fj 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3). ,* i Finally, the duties to be performed by the beneficiary are not so specialized or complex that knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty. Nor are the duties so complex or unique that they can be performed only by an individual with a degree in a specific specialty. The duties are routine for the position in the industry. The petitioner has failed to establish the referenced criteria at 8 C.F.R. $6 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2) or (4). As related in the discussion above, the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Accordingly, the AAO shall not disturb the director's denial of the petition. , L' I I SRC04 133 51938 * Page 5 The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1361. The petitioner has failed to sustain that burden and the appeal shall accordingly be'dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.