dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Nursing

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Nursing

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, a nursing placement agency, failed to establish that the proffered position of a registered nurse qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO found that a bachelor's degree is not a standard minimum requirement for registered nurses, referencing the Occupational Outlook Handbook. The petitioner also did not provide sufficient evidence that the specific duties were so complex or unique as to necessitate a degree, especially given the lack of detail about the ultimate work site.

Criteria Discussed

Normal Minimum Requirement Of A Baccalaureate Or Higher Degree For The Position Degree Requirement Is Common To The Industry For Parallel Positions Employer Normally Requires A Degree For The Position Nature Of The Specific Duties Is So Specialized And Complex That It Requires A Degree

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
rden- deto deldod Q 
prevent &mty nn- 
invasion of ~emd ~rtvact 
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: EAC 02 232 53128 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: APR 0 5 zoo6 
PETITION: 
 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS : 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
pp Administrative Appeals Office 
EAC 02 232 53 128 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now 
before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will 
be denied. 
The petitioner is a nursing placement agency that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a registered nurse. The 
petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant 
to section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. $ 
1 10 1 (a)(l S)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition because the proffered position is not a specialty occupation and the 
beneficiary is not qualified to perform the services of a specialty occupation. On appeal, counsel submits a 
brief and additional documentation. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 8 1184(i)(l), defines the term 
"specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: 
(A) 
 theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and 
(B) 
 attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) 
as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. $ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of 
the following criteria: 
(I) 
 A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement 
for entry into the particular position; 
(2) 
 The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar 
organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is 
so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 
(3) 
 The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) 
 The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to 
perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher 
degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
$ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is 
directly related to the proffered position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the 
director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the 
director's denial letter; and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in 
its entirety before issuing its decision. 
EAC 02 232 53 128 
Page 3 
In the initial petition, the petitioner stated that it was seeking the beneficiary's services as a licensed practical 
nurse. In response to the director's first request for evidence, the petitioner requested to change the 
beneficiary and to change the proffered position to that of a registered nurse. The petitioner submitted 
educational documents for the second beneficiary. The petitioner stated that the beneficiary will be qualified 
to function in a variety of departments, providing nursing care to patients, administering prescribed 
medications, formulation of plans of nursing care, patient assessments; working in specialized areas such as 
geriatric, psychiatric, pediatric, cardiac care; and supervising other nurses or even supervising an entire unit. 
The petitioner stated that the position requires a bachelor's degree in nursing. 
The director issued a second request for evidence that the proffered position was a specialty occupation. The 
director noted that the petitioner is an employment agency and thereby would not be the beneficiary's actual 
employer. The director requested evidence that the entity ultimately employing the beneficiary requires a 
bachelor's degree for all employees in that position. The director requested a written agreement between the 
petitioner and contracting facility where the beneficiary would be working. The director requested a detailed 
job description that is on file with the contracting organizations' human resources or personnel office. The 
director requested a weekly breakdown of the number of hours devoted to each of the beneficiary's proposed 
duties. The director requested an organizational chart for the contracting facility and the department where 
the beneficiary will be assigned. The director requested evidence confirming that the beneficiary holds a 
registered nursing license in the state of intended employment. 
In response, the petitioner submitted a second labor condition application for the position of registered nurse. 
The petitioner submitted the second beneficiary's CGFNS examination result, which the petitioner stated 
confirms that the beneficiary is eligible to take the Board of Nursing NCLEX-RN Examination. The 
petitioner stated that it is unable to provide a weekly breakdown of the number of hours devoted to each duty 
or explain how many employees may be supervised. The petitioner stated that such details will vary with his 
assignments. 
The director found that the proffered position was not a specialty occupation because the petitioner failed to 
establish any of the criteria found at 8 C.F.R. 
 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). The director noted that the duties of the 
position were routine to any nursing position and, according to the Department of Labor's Occupational 
Outlook Handbook (Handbook), an individual does not need to hold a baccalaureate degree in nursing to fill a 
registered nurse position. The director found the proffered position difficult to assess when the record 
contained limited information on the actual business where the beneficiary will be working. The director 
noted that there was little documentation about the actual place where the beneficiary will be working, its 
requirements for the position, and what the beneficiary will be doing in this position. The director found that 
the duties of the proffered position paralleled those carried out by registered nurses, as described in the 
Handbook. The director found that the petitioner did not establish that the proffered position satisfies one of 
the above listed criteria. 
On appeal, counsel asserts that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Counsel asserts that the 
position as described involved supervisory duties and placements in a variety of specialized hospital or 
nursing home environments. Counsel asserts that the position involves nursing supervisory duties and 
working in specialized care departments and is therefore not an entry-level position. Counsel asserts that the 
petitioner's requirement for a bachelor's degree is not self-imposed. Counsel asserts that the petitioner 
submitted letters from three facilities that may require the beneficiary's services as an R.N. possessing a 
bachelor's degree. Counsel contends that it is unfair and impractical to require from the petitioner more 
EAC 02 232 53 128 
Page 4 
details about the beneficiary's professional commitments until the beneficiary is in the United States. 
Counsel contends that the petitioner described the second beneficiary's duties in detail as much as possible. 
Additionally, counsel contends that the second beneficiary may be granted one initial year in H-1B status, in 
which to obtain the CGFNS Certificate based upon a Memorandum for Service Center Directors dated 
September 22,2003 from William R. Yates, Associate Director for Operations, CIS, DHS. 
Upon review of the record, the petitioner has established none of the four criteria outlined in 8 C.F.R. 
8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Therefore, the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. 
The AAO turns first to the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(l) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher 
degree or its equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; a degree 
requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations; or a particular 
position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. 
Factors often considered by CIS when determining these criteria include: whether the Handbook reports that the 
industry requires a degree; whether the industry's professional association has made a degree a minimum entry 
requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from firms or individuals in the industry attest that such firms 
"routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals." See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 
(D.Minn. 1999)(quoting Hird/Blaker Corp. v. Sava, 712 F. Supp. 1095,1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). 
The AAO routinely consults the Handbook for its information about the duties and educational requirements of 
particular occupations. As the director noted, no evidence in the Handbook indicates that a baccalaureate or 
higher degree, or its equivalent, is required for a registered nursing job. 
In the Handbook, 2006-2007 edition, the DOL states the following about the training and educational 
requirements for registered nurse positions: 
There are three major educational paths to registered nursing: a bachelor's of science degree 
in nursing (BSN), an associate degree in Nursing (A.D.N.), and a diploma. . . . Generally, 
licensed graduates of any of the three types of educational programs qualify for entry-level 
positions as staff nurses. 
[Slome career paths are open only to nurses with bachelor's or advanced degrees. A 
bachelor's degree is often necessary for administrative positions, and it is a prerequisite for 
admission to graduate nursing programs in research, consulting, teaching, or a clinical 
specialization. 
According to the Handbook, candidates for the offered position would not require a bachelor's degree for entry 
into the occupation. Thus, the petitioner fails to establish that a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent 
is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the proffered position. The petitioner has, thus, not 
established the criteria set forth at 8 C.F.R. tj 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I). 
There is insufficient evidence in the record to establish the first alternative prong of the second criterion - that 
a specific degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations. 
The petitioner submitted several advertisements for nurse positions fkom hospital and medical facilities 
located in Massachusetts. Many of the advertisements state that a bachelor's degree is preferred but do not 
EAC 02 232 53 128 
Page 5 
indicate that a degree is required. 
 There is no evidence in the record to establish that the advertising 
organizations are similar to the petitioner or to the organizations where the petitioner would place the 
beneficiary. Counsel asserts that the petitioner provided ample evidence that many employers in 
Massachusetts do require a bachelor's degree in nursing for a registered nursing position. The evidence in the 
record does not support counsel's assertion. Without documentary evidence to support the claim, the 
assertions of counsel will not satisfy the petitioner's burden of proof. The unsupported assertions of counsel 
do not constitute evidence. Matter of Obaigbena, 19 I&N Dec. 533, 534 (BIA 1988); Matter of Laureano, 19 
I&N Dec. 1 (BIA 1983); Matter of Ramirez-Sanchez, 17 I&N Dec. 503, 506 (BIA 1980). The petitioner has 
not established that the particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an 
individual with a degree, as required to satisfy the second alternative prong of 8 C.F.R. 
9 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2). 
The AAO now turns to the criterion at 8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3) - the employer normally requires a 
degree or its equivalent for the position. The petitioner states that it had several U.S. employees who are 
employed in professional nursing positions. The petitioner submits two diplomas. The petitioner did not submit 
any evidence to establish that the petitioner had employed these individuals such as payroll records or other 
employment documentation. The record does not contain any evidence of the petitioner's past hiring practices 
and therefore, the petitioner has not met its burden of proof in this regard. 
Finally, the AAO turns to the criterion at 8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(iii)(A)(4) - the nature of the specific duties is so 
specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment 
of a baccalaureate or higher degree. 
Counsel asserts repeatedly that the proffered position is not that of an entry-level nurse. The duties described 
by the petitioner are those of a registered nurse as described in the Handbook. The petitioner submitted letters 
from three businesses that may be interested in the services of the beneficiary. These letters did not contain a 
specific job description or confirm that they would hire the beneficiary. Neither counsel nor the petitioner has 
described the duties of the position in sufficient detail to demonstrate that this position requires a 
baccalaureate degree. In Defensor v. Meissner, 201 F. 3d 384 (5' Cir. 2000), the court held that the Immigration 
and Naturalization Service, now Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS), reasonably interpreted the statute 
and the regulations when it required the petitioner to show that the entities ultimately employing the foreign 
nurses require a bachelor's degree for all employees in that position. The court found that the degree requirement 
should not orignate with the employment agency that brought the nurses to the United States for employment 
with the agency's clients. The record does not contain a comprehensive description of the beneficiary's 
proposed duties from an authorized representative of the client. Without such a description, the petitioner has 
not demonstrated that the work that the beneficiary will perform at the client site will qualify as a specialty 
occupation. The petitioner has not demonstrated how an experienced, licensed nurse without a degree would 
be unable to perform the duties of the proffered position. The petitioner has not sufficiently distinguished the 
duties of a registered nurse in the proffered position from those of an associate degreed nurse. To the extent 
that they are depicted in the record, the duties do not appear so specialized and complex as to require the 
highly specialized knowledge associated with a baccalaureate or higher degree, or its equivalent, in a specific 
specialty. Therefore, the evidence does not establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation 
under 8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). 
The second issue in this case is whether the second beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of a specialty 
occupation. The director found that the record does not include evidence that the beneficiary is a licensed 
EAC 02 232 53128 
Page 6 
registered nurse in Massachusetts or other evidence that the beneficiary is immediately eligible to practice 
registered nursing in Massachusetts. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(v)(A), if an occupation requires a state or local license for an individual to 
fully perform the duties of the occupation, an alien (except an H-1C nurse) seeking H classification in that 
occupation must have that license prior to approval of the petition to be found qualified to enter the United 
States and immediately engage in employment in the occupation. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(v)(B), if a temporary license is available and the alien is allowed to perform 
the duties of the occupation without a permanent license, the director shall examine the nature of the duties, 
the level at which the duties are performed, the degree of supervision received, and any limitations placed on 
the alien. If an analysis of the facts demonstrates that the alien under supervision is authorized to fully 
perform the duties of the occupation, H classification may be granted. 
On appeal, counsel contends that the second beneficiary may be granted one initial year in H-1B status, in 
which to obtain the CGFNS Certificate based upon a Memorandum for Service Center Directors dated 
September 22,2003 fiom William R. Yates, Associate Director for Operations, CIS, DHS. The memorandum 
referred to by counsel concerns the certification of foreign health care workers. The memorandum does not 
discuss individual states' licensing requirements for health care workers. To practice nursing in 
Massachusetts one must hold a valid, current license issued by the Massachusetts Board of Registration in 
1 
Nursing. 
 The petitioner has not established that the second beneficiary is a licensed registered nurse or 
provided any other evidence that he is immediately eligible to practice registered nursing in Massachusetts. 
As related in the discussion above, the petitioner has failed to establish that the proffered position is a 
specialty occupation or that the second beneficiary is qualified to perform services of a specialty occupation. 
Accordingly, the AAO shall not disturb the director's denial of the petition. 
Beyond the decision of the director, the AAO notes that the petitioner substituted beneficiaries and changed 
the proffered position in response to the director's initial request for evidence. The petitioner stated, "it is 
our understanding the LPNs do not usually qualify as professionals. For this reason, because we intend to 
sponsor a professional nurse, and since [the initial beneficiary] is no longer interested in the position, we 
would respectfully request that we be allowed to substitute [MT as the beneficiary of our [pletition." 
The purpose of the request for evidence is to elicit further information that clarifies whether eligibility for the 
benefit sought has been established. 8 C.F.R. 3 103.2(b)(8). When responding to a request for evidence, a 
petitioner cannot offer a new position to the beneficiary, or materially change a position's title, its level of 
authority within the organizational hierarchy, or its associated job responsibilities. If significant changes are 
made to the initial request for approval, the petitioner must file a new petition rather than seek approval of a 
petition that is not supported by the facts in the record. Substitution of beneficiaries is not allowed on an 
H-1B petition. The petition was for a position that required less than a baccalaureate level training in nursing, 
a licensed practical nurse. The petition was on behalf of an individual with less than a baccalaureate level of 
education. Neither the position nor the beneficiary qualified for benefits as H-1B. For this additional reason, 
the petition must be denied. 
EAC 02 232 53128 
Page 7 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 
9 1361. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.