dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Product Design
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner did not respond to the AAO's request to verify its intent to pursue the appeal. This inquiry was made after USCIS records showed that a subsequent H-1B petition for the same beneficiary had already been approved.
Criteria Discussed
Abandonment Labor Condition Application (Lca) Wage Requirements
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTEROFS-T-D Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE : SEPT. 26, 2019 APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner , an ___________________ seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "product designer" under the H-IB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) , 8 U.S.C. ยง l 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-IB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition , concluding that the Petitioner had not established that ( 1) it submitted a certified labor condition application that corresponded to the petition ; and (2) it would pay the Beneficiary an adequate salary for his work. On appeal , the Petitioner submits a brief and asserts that the Director 's decision was erroneous . We will dismiss the appeal. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicate that after the instant petition was filed, the Petitioner filed another Form 1-129 petition also seeking H-IB nonimmigrant classification for the Beneficiary . USCIS records further indicate that this other petition was approved , for the period March 26, 2019 , to March 4, 2022. We sent a letter to the Petitioner requesting verification of its intent to pursue this appeal , and have not received a response. A benefit request may be denied as abandoned , denied based on the record , or denied for both reasons if a petitioner does not respond to a request for evidence or a notice of intent to deny by the required date. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(b)(13)(i). Therefore, the appeal will be dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner did not respond to our request within the time permitted. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as abandoned pursuant to 8 C.F .R. ยง I 03 .2(b )(l 3)(i). Cite as Matter of S-T- โกID# 3996584 (AAO Sept. 26, 2019)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.