dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Psychology
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed on procedural grounds without a review of the merits. The AAO determined that the appeal was improperly filed by the beneficiary of the petition. Per regulations, a beneficiary is not a recognized party in the proceeding and is therefore not authorized to file an appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Standing To Appeal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 i-iing dg drksd to prevent clearly tmammtd invasion of personel privw PUBLIC COPY FILE: EAC 04 084 53126 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: Petition for a Nonirnrnigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Robert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office EAC 04 084 53126 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimrnigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be rejected. The petitioner is a hospital that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a counseling psychologist. The petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section lOl(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The director denied the petition on the basis that the beneficiary was not qualified to perform services in a specialty occupation. The beneficiary, not an authorized representative of the petitioner, signed the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal to the Administrative Appeals Office that was submitted in conjunction with the appeal. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) regulations specifically state that a beneficiary of a visa petition is not a recognized party in a proceeding. 8 C.F.R. 103.2(a)(3). As the beneficiary is not a recognized party, the beneficiary is not authorized to file an appeal. 8 C.F.R. 103.3(a)(l)(iii)(B). Accordingly, the AAO will reject the appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(S). ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.