Dismissed
H-1B
H-1B Dismissed โ Regulatory Affairs (2022): did not establish the proffered position of 'Regulatory
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the proffered position of 'Regulatory Specialist I' qualifies as a specialty occupation. The petitioner provided inconsistent and materially changed job requirements after filing, and the supporting evidence, such as industry job postings, was found to be flawed, irrelevant (e.g., for UK-based positions), or undated, thus lacking probative value.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation (8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A))
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ