dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Restaurant/Event Management

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Restaurant/Event Management

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove that the proffered position of 'events specialist' qualifies as a specialty occupation. The AAO determined that the petitioner did not meet any of the four regulatory criteria, noting that the Occupational Outlook Handbook does not indicate that a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty is a normal minimum requirement for similar positions like marketing or promotions manager.

Criteria Discussed

Normal Minimum Requirement Of A Bachelor'S Degree Degree Requirement Is Common To The Industry Or The Position Is Complex/Unique Employer Normally Requires A Degree For The Position Duties Are So Specialized And Complex That They Require A Degree

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Wash~ngton, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
FILE: WAC 04 038 50370 Office: CALIFORNLA SERVICE CENTER Date: OCT 3 1 Zffnr 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 I lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS : 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Director 
Administrative Appeals Office 
WAC 04 038 50370 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The director of the service center denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now 
before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will be 
denied. 
The petitioner is engaged in the business of operating restaurants and seeks to employ the beneficiary as an 
events specialist. The petitioner, therefore, endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a 
specialty occupation pursuant to section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 
8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition because the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. On appeal, 
counsel submits additional evidence. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation 
that requires: 
(A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and 
(B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) 
as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the 
following criteria: 
(I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement 
for entry into the particular position; 
(2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar 
organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is 
so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 
(3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required 
to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or 
higher degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
5 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is 
directly related to the proffered position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the 
director's request for additional evidence; (3) counsel's response to the director's request; (4) the director's 
denial letter; and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in its 
entirety before issuing its decision. 
WAC 04 038 50370 
Page 3 
The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as an events specialist. Evidence of the beneficiary's 
duties includes: the Form 1-129; the attachments accompanying the Form 1-129; the November 14, 2003 
company support letter; and counsel's response to the director's request for evidence. According to this 
evidence, the beneficiary would perform duties that entail handling the petitioner's events, banquets, catering 
and productions and entertainment shows; (1) planning, orchestrating, and handling all logistics for events, 
productions, shows and banquets; conducting research and recommending shows and events to increase 
company visibility in the community, including researching and procuring talents, working with banquet staff, 
and providing marketing and public relations support (30% of time); (2) tapping new markets for shows and 
events and creating and implementing successful marketing plans and strategies; conducting sales calls and 
searching out new leads and completing follow up contact (20% of time); (3) creating, developing and 
preparing design presentation for client review; assisting customers with event and shows conception, budget 
analysis, development and coordination through implementation and final reconciliation (20% of time); 
managing onsite events including identifying cross functional opportunities; providing coordination and 
integration of events and shows (15% of time); and (5) preparing accurate and comprehensive banquet event 
orders with the ability to multi-task several different responsibilities with accuracy and professionalism (15% 
of time). The petitioner indicated that the proffered position requires a bachelor's degree. 
The director requested additional information about the proffered position. The director requested evidence 
that the proffered position meets one of the above listed criteria. 
The director determined that the proffered position was not a specialty occupation. The director found that 
the petitioner failed to establish that there is a bona fide position. The director found that the petitioner did 
not establish that the proffered position meets one of the above listed criteria. 
On appeal, counsel asserts that the petitioner has established that there is a bona fide offer of employment. 
Counsel explains that the petitioner operates three restaurants. Counsel assert that as part of its marketing 
strategy, the petitioner is in the business of producing special events, concerts and entertainment shows. 
Counsel contends that the petitioner has a unique and special need for the services of an events specialist with 
all the special events, concerts, and shows that it is involved in. The petitioner submits a contract between 
itself and Comic Lab, copies of posters of concerts it has participated in and newspaper articles about the 
petitioner as evidence of an offer of employment. 
Upon review of the record, the petitioner has established none of the four criteria outlined in 8 C.F.R. 
9 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Therefore, the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. 
The AAO considers the criteria at 8 C.F.R. $8 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher degree 
or its equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; a degree 
requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations; or a particular 
position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. Factors often 
considered by CIS when determining these criteria include: whether the Department of Labor's Occupational 
Outlook Handbook (Handbook) reports that the industry requires a degree; whether the industry's professional 
association has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits fi-om fms or 
individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals." See 
Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1151,1165 (D.Minn. 1999)(quoting HirdBlaker Corp. v. Sava, 712 F. Supp. 
1095,1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). 
WAC 04 038 50370 
Page 4 
In determining whether a position qualifies as a specialty occupation, CIS looks beyond the title of the 
position and determines, fi-om a review of the duties of the position and any supporting evidence, whether the 
position actually requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, 
and the attainment of a baccalaureate degree in a specific specialty as the minimum for entry into the 
occupation as required by the Act. 
Based on the record of proceeding, the AAO has determined that the proffered position is most similar to that 
of a marketing manager and a promotions manager as defined in the Handbook. According to the Handbook, 
marketing managers develop the firm's detailed marketing strategy. With the help of subordinates, marketing 
managers determine the demand for products and services offered by the firm and its competitors. In 
addition, they identify potential markets. According to the Handbook, marketing managers develop pricing 
strategy with an eye towards maximizing the firm's share of the market and its profits while ensuring that the 
firm's customers are satisfied. This is similar to the proffered position in that the duties include developing 
pricing strategies, balancing firm objectives and customer satisfaction; formulating and coordinating 
marketing activities and policies to promote products and services working with advertising and promotional 
managers; identifying, developing and evaluating marketing strategy, based on knowledge of establishment 
objectives, market characteristics, and cost and markup factors. The Handbook reveals that promotion 
managers may direct programs involving special events. 
With respect to the educational qualifications required of marketing managers and promotion managers, the 
Handbook states: 
A wide range of educational backgrounds is suitable for entry into advertising, marketing, 
promotions, public relations, and sales managerial jobs, but many employers prefer those with 
experience in related occupations plus a broad liberal arts background. For marketing, sales 
and promotions management positions, some employers prefer a bachelor's or master's degree 
in business administration with an emphasis on marketing. 
Consequently, there is insufficient evidence in the record to establish that a baccalaureate or higher degree or 
its equivalent in a specific specialty is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the marketing manager 
position. 
The petitioner has not provided evidence to establish the second criterion - that a specific degree requirement 
is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations. The petitioner submitted one 
letter hom a restaurant owner which indicated that it was in the same business and required that its event 
planner have a bachelor's degree. One letter is insufficient to establish that a specific degree requirement is 
common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations. Nor can the petitioner establish that 
the particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree. 
Nor is there evidence in the record to establish the third criterion at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A): that the 
petitioner normally requires a specific degree or its equivalent for the position. 
The fourth criterion at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) requires that the petitioner establish that the nature of the 
specific duties is so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform the duties is usually 
WAC 04 038 50370 
Page 5 
associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. To the extent they are described in the 
record, the duties of the position are not so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform 
them is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty. The 
duties parallel those in the Handbook for a marketing and promotions manager, an occupation that does not 
require a specific baccalaureate degree. Contrary to counsel's assertions, the AAO has considered the duties 
of the beneficiary in relation to the petitioner's business of operating a restaurant with special events. The 
petitioner submitted a contract with a comedy group and other advertisements about previous special events. 
This information does not demonstrate that the duties of the proffered position are more specialized or 
complex than what is normally encountered in the occupational field of marketing and promotions. The 
petitioner has not established that the duties to be performed for its business are so complex as to require a 
degree in a specific specialty. The petitioner therefore fails to establish the fourth criterion. 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 
$ 1361. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.