dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Software

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Software

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the matter was considered moot. The Petitioner had filed a subsequent H-1B petition for the same Beneficiary, and that petition was approved, rendering this appeal unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re : 8847294 
Appeal of California Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE : JUNE 8, 2020 
The Petitioner , a software , services and internet technologies business , seeks to temporarily employ 
the Beneficiary as a product marketing manager under the H-lB nonimmigrant clas sification for 
specialty occupations . See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 
8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i) (b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a 
qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of 
a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor 's or higher degree in the 
specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition , concluding the evidence was 
insufficient to establish that the position qualified as a specialty occupation under any of the criteria 
in 8 C.F.R. ยง 214 .2(h)(4)(iii)(A) . The matter is now before us on appeal. On appeal , the Petitioner 
asserts that the Director did not consider all the evidence submitted and held the Petitioner to a higher 
standard than preponderance of the evidence. We will dismiss the appeal. 
U.S . Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner filed a subsequent Form 
1-129, Petition forNonimmigrant Worker, seeking nonimmigrant H-1B classification on behalf of the 
Beneficiary and that the petition was approved . 
Because the Beneficiary of the instant petition has been approved for H-lB employment with 
Petitioner, further pursuit of the matter at hand would be moot. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.