dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as moot. The AAO found that the petitioner had filed a new Form I-129 petition for the same beneficiary after the initial denial, and that new petition was approved. Therefore, further pursuit of the appeal was considered unnecessary.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Employer-Employee Relationship
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 3665600 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: MAR. 17, 2020 The Petitioner , a software development and consulting firm, seeks to employ the Beneficiary temporarily as an "Android developer" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the California Service Center denied the Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, concluding that the record did not establish eligibility, due to a lack of evidence to establish that the position qualified as a specialty occupation. The Director further determined that a lack of evidence adversely impacted the Petitioner's ability to demonstrate an employer-employee relationship with the Beneficiary. On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the Director denied the petition in error. A review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) records indicates that on a date subsequent to the denial of the instant petition, the Petitioner submitted a new Form I-129 on behalf of the Beneficiary. USCIS records further indicate that this new Form I-129 was approved. Because the Beneficiary in the instant petition has been approved for H-lB employment with the Petitioner based upon the filing of another petition, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.