dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as moot, not on its merits. The AAO found that the petitioner had filed another H-1B petition for the same beneficiary, which was subsequently approved. Because the beneficiary was already approved for H-1B employment with the petitioner, pursuing the appeal was deemed unnecessary.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 18849958 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: AUG. 5, 2021 The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "software developer" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. 1 The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position . The California Service Center Director denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner had not established the proffered position is a specialty occupation and that the Beneficiary would perform services in a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred by denying the petition. 2 The matter is now before us on appeal. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner filed another Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, seeking the same nonimmigrant classification on behalf of the Beneficiary, and that the petition was approved . Because the Beneficiary has been approved for H-lB employment with the Petitioner, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 1 See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) . 2 The Administrative Appeals Office initially rejected the appeal as untimely filed, however , we subsequently notified the Petitioner that the rejection decision was being withdrawn. Thus, we are reopening the matter on a service motion .
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.