dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as moot. The AAO noted that the petitioner had filed a subsequent H-1B petition for the same beneficiary, and that new petition had been approved, rendering the current appeal unnecessary.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary Qualifications Mootness
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 17514667 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date : JUN. 9, 2021 The Petitioner, a computer software and hardware development company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "software development engineer" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding the evidence was insufficient to establish that the Beneficiary is qualified for the position. The matter is now before us on appeal. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred in denying the petition . Upon de nova review, we will dismiss appeal. 1 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner filed a subsequent Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker, seeking nonimmigrant H-lB classification on behalf of the Beneficiary and that the petition was approved. Because the Beneficiary of the instant petition has been approved for H-lB employment with Petitioner, further pursuit of the matter at hand would be moot. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 1 We follow the preponderance of the evidence standard as specified in Matter of Chawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010).
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.