dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide a statement, brief, or any evidence in support of the appeal. The petitioner did not identify any specific error of law or fact in the director's initial decision, which is grounds for a summary dismissal.
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF R-P- LLC Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: JUNE 15,2017 APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, a software development and enterprise applications integration company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a software developer under the 1-1-1 B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.P.R.ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). On appeal, the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of filing. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.P.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(v). Cite as Matter of R-P- LLC, ID# 438762 (AAO June 15, 2017)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.