dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Software Engineering

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Software Engineering

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed as moot. The Director had initially denied the petition, concluding the beneficiary was no longer exempt from the H-1B numerical cap. However, the AAO found that the petitioner had since filed another H-1B petition for the same beneficiary which was approved, making the current appeal unnecessary.

Criteria Discussed

H-1B Cap Exemption

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF W-M-A-, INC. 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: JAN. 12, 2017 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, a discount retail store, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "senior 
software engineer" under the H-1 B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. 
See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a 
qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application 
of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the "attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in 
the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director, California Service Center, denied the petition. The Director concluded that the 
Beneficiary was no longer eligible for exemption from the numerical limitation on the number of 
persons who can be provided H-1B classification in a fiscal year (the H-1B CAP). The matter is 
now before us on appeal. In its appeal, the Petitioner submits a brief and documentary evidence, 
asserting that the Director erred in not recognizing the Beneficiary as exempt from the H-1 B CAP. 
A review of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicates that the Petitioner filed 
another petition seeking H-1B nonimmigrant classification on behalf of the Beneficiary, and that the 
other petition was approved. 
Because the Beneficiary in the instant petition has been approved for H-1 B employment with the 
Petitioner, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
Cite as Matter qfW-M-A-. Inc., ID# 94598 (AAO Jan. 12, 2017) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.