dismissed H-1B Case: Special Education

idaaifybgbdehib 
prevent clearly un- 
invasion of personal pivrey 
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: WAC 04 25 1 53259 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: APR 1 1 2006 
rN RE: 
PETITION: 
 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10l(a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1 I Ol(a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Director 
Administrative Appeals Office 
WAC 04 25 1 53259 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now 
before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be dismissed. The petition will 
be denied. 
The petitioner 'is a learning center that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a special education tutor. The 
petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant 
to 5 10l(a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 1 Ol(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition because the beneficiary is not qualified to perform the duties of a specialty 
occupation. On appeal, counsel submits a letter and additional evidence including: a letter from the 
petitioner's academic director; a letter from the beneficiary's former tutor and advisor; a letter from the 
"Headteacher" at the U.K. school where the beneficiary worked for two years; a letter from a qualified 
"Special Needs Coordinator (SENCO)" at the U.K. school where the beneficiary currently works; a 
"Certificate of Attendance"; and a new credentials evaluation for the beneficiary. 
Section 214(i)(2) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 11 84(i)(2), states that an alien applying for classification as an H-lB 
nonimmigrant worker must possess full state licensure to practice in the occupation, if such licensure is 
required to practice in the occupation, and completion of the degree in the specialty that the occupation 
requires. If the alien does not possess the required degree, the petitioner must demonstrate that the alien has 
experience in the specialty equivalent to the completion of such degree, and recognition of expertise in the 
specialty through progressively responsible positions relating to the specialty. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C), to qualify to perform services in a specialty occupation, an alien 
must meet one of the following criteria: 
(I) 
 Hold a United States baccalaureate or higher degree required by the specialty 
occupation from an accredited college or university; 
(2) 
 Hold a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a United States baccalaureate or 
higher degree required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college or 
university; 
(3) 
 Hold an unrestricted state license, registration or certification which authorizes him 
or her to fully practice the specialty occupation and be immediately engaged in that 
specialty in the state of intended employment; or 
(4) 
 Have education, specialized training, andlor progressively responsible experience 
that is equivalent to completion of a United States baccalaureate or higher degree in 
the specialty occupation, and have recognition of expertise in the specialty through 
progressively responsible positions directly related to the specialty. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(D), equating the beneficiary's credentials to a United States 
baccalaureate or higher degree shall be determined by one or more of the following: 
WAC 04 25 1 53259 
Page 3 
(I) An evaluation from an official who has authority to grant college-level credit for training 
and/or experience in the specialty at an accredited college or university which has a program 
for granting such credit based on an individual's training andlor work experience; 
(2) The results of recognized college-level equivalency examinations or special credit programs, 
such as the College Level Examination Program (CLEP), or Program on Noncollegiate 
Sponsored Instruction (PONSI); 
(3) An evaluation of education by a reliable credentials evaluation service which specializes in 
evaluating foreign educational credentials; 
(4) Evidence of certification or registration from a nationally-recognized professional association 
or society for the specialty that is known to grant certification or registration to persons in the 
occupational specialty who have achieved a certain level of competence in the specialty; 
(5) A determination by the Service that the equivalent of the degree required by the specialty 
occupation has been acquired through a combination of education, specialized training, 
and/or work experience in areas related to the specialty and that the alien has achieved 
recognition of expertise in the specialty occupation as a result of such training and 
experience. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains, in part: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; 
(2) the director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the 
director's denial letter; and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in 
its entirety before issuing its decision. 
The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as a special education tutor. The petitioner's president 
indicated in his August 24,2004 letter that a qualified candidate for the job would possess a bachelor's degree 
in education and specialized knowledge in social or behavioral science. 
The director found that the beneficiary was not qualified for the proffered position, which is similar to that of 
a special education teacher, because the beneficiary does not hold a bachelor's degree in special education or 
a related field, and she does not hold an unrestricted State license, registration, or certificate authorizing her to 
practice the specialty occupation. On appeal, counsel states, in part, that the beneficiary is qualified for the 
position because she has acquired an equivalent of the required degree, pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 
3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(D)(5). As supporting documentation, counsel submits: a letter from the petitioner's 
academic director; a letter from the beneficiary's former tutor and advisor; a letter from the "Headteacher" at 
the U.K. school where the beneficiary worked for two years; a letter from a qualified "Special Needs 
Coordinator (SENCO) at the U.K. school where the beneficiary currently works; a "Certificate of 
Attendance"; and a new credentials evaluation for the beneficiary. 
In its Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook), 2006-2007 edition, the Department of Labor (DOL) 
states the following regarding the training of persons seeking employment as special education teachers: 
All 50 States and the District of Columbia require special education teachers to be 
licensed. . . . 
WAC 04 25 1 53259 
Page 4 
For traditional licensing, all States require a bachelor's degree and the completion of an 
approved teacher preparation program with a prescribed number of subject and education 
credits and supervised practice teaching. However, many States require a master's degree in 
special education, involving at least 1 year of additional course work, including a 
specialization, beyond the bachelor's degree. . . . 
The website of the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing at 
htt~://www.ctc.ca.~ov/credentials/leaflets/cl808.html, which describes the credential requirements for special 
education teachers educated outside of California, states: 
California has a two-tier credential structure. A five-year preliminary Level I credential is the 
first document issued after the individual meets basic credential requirements. The Level I1 is 
the professional clear credential which is issued once all credential requirements have been 
completed. The Education Specialist Instruction Credential authorizes the holder to teach in the 
area of specialization listed on the credential in the following settings: 
Special day classes; 
Special schools; 
Home/hospital settings; 
Correctional facilities; 
Nonpublic schools and agencies; and 
Resource rooms. 
In this case, the beneficiary holds a bachelor's degree in sociology and a "Postgraduate Certificate in 
Education" conferred by a U.K. institution. The record also contains a document certifying that the 
beneficiary has attained qualified teacher status (QTS) and meets the qualifications to teach in "maintained 
and non-maintained special schools in England," and a Certificate of Attendance reflecting that the 
beneficiary attended the course, "Understanding Special Educational Needs (Primary)." The record 
additionally contains an evaluation from a company that specializes in evaluating academic credentials 
concluding that the beneficiary possesses the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in sociology with a 
second major in education. Counsel submits a second evaluation on appeal whose evaluator concludes that the 
beneficiary holds the U.S. equivalent of a bachelor's degree in special education. The record, however, 
contains no independent evidence, such as a letter from the university provost, that the evaluator of this 
second evaluation is an official who has authority to grant college-level credit for training and/or experience 
in the specialty at an accredited college or university which has a program for granting such credit based on 
an individual's training and/or work experience, as required by 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(D)(l). Moreover, 
as discussed above, a review of the Handbook finds that all 50 States and the District of Columbia require 
special education teachers to be licensed. The record, however, contains no evidence that the beneficiary 
holds the required State licensure. As related in the discussion above, the petitioner has failed to establish that 
the beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the proffered position. Accordingly, the AAO shall not 
disturb the director's denial of the petition. 
WAC 04 251 53259 
Page 5 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 
§ 136 1. The petitioner has not sustained that burden. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is dismissed. The petition is denied.