dismissed H-1B

dismissed H-1B Case: Unknown

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Unknown

Decision Summary

The Director denied the petition because the beneficiary had not maintained her nonimmigrant status. The AAO rejected the appeal, stating that it lacks jurisdiction over the denial of a request for a change of status, as such a decision is within the sole discretion of the Director.

Criteria Discussed

Maintenance Of Nonimmigrant Status Jurisdiction Over Change Of Status Denial

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 19882482 
Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: FEB. 24, 2022 
The Petitioner seeks to employ the Beneficiary under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty 
occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified 
foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body 
of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific 
specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Texas Service Center Director denied the Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, 
concluding that the Beneficiary has not maintained her nonimmigrant status in the United States. The 
matter is now before us on appeal. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility 
by a preponderance of the evidence. Section 291 of the Act; Matter of Chawathe, 25 l&N Dec. 369, 
375 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter de nova. See Matter of Christo 's Inc., 26 
l&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de nova review, we will reject the appeal. 
The authority to adjudicate appeals is delegated to us by the Secretary of the Department of Homeland 
Security (OHS) pursuant to the authority vested in him through the Homeland Security Act of 2002, 
Pub. L. 107-296. See OHS Delegation Number 0150.1 (effective March 1, 2003); see also 8 C.F.R. 
ยง 2.1 (2003). The regulations limit our jurisdiction over petitions for temporary workers to those 
described under 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2 and 214.6. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.l(f)(3)(iii)(J) (2003). 
A request for a change of status or an extension of stay in an H-lB submission is not a petition within the 
meaning of section 214(c)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(c)(l), and thus, does not confer any of the appeal 
rights normally associated with a petition. The Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, in this 
context is merely the vehicle by which information is collected to make a determination on the application 
for a change of status. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.l(c)(l). There is no appeal from the denial of a request for a 
change of status. 8 C.F.R. ยง 248.3(g). 
The Director concluded that the Beneficiary has not maintained her nonimmigrant status in the United 
States and denied the request for change of status. On appeal, the Petitioner does not contest the 
Director 's conclusion and seeks forgiveness for not knowing that the Beneficiary has not maintained 
her non immigrant status. However, we do not have jurisdiction over this matter, as issues surrounding 
the Beneficiary's maintenance of nonimmigrant status are within the sole discretion of the Director. 
Accordingly, we must reject the appeal. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 
2 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.