dismissed
H-1B
dismissed H-1B Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as abandoned. The AAO sent the Petitioner a request to verify its intent to continue the appeal, noting that another H-1B petition for the same beneficiary had been approved. The Petitioner did not respond to the request within the permitted time.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Abandonment
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 5671828 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date : JAN. 22, 2020 The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-IB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position . The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the evidence of record does not establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation, and dismissed a subsequent motion to reopen and motion to reconsider. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred and the evidence supports an approval of the petition. We will dismiss the appeal. U.S . Citizenship and hnmigration Services (USCIS) records indicate that after the instant petition was filed, the Petitioner filed a petition seeking nonimmigrant H-IB classification on behalf of the Beneficiary. USCIS records further indicate that the other petition was approved. We sent a letter to the Petitioner requesting verification of its intent to pursue this appeal, and have not received a response. A benefit request may be denied as abandoned, denied based on the record, or denied for both reasons if a petitioner does not respond to a request for evidence or a notice of intent to deny by the required date. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(b)(13)(i). Therefore , the appeal will be dismissed as abandoned because the Petitioner did not respond to our request within the time permitted. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as abandoned pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.2(b)(13)(i) .
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.