remanded H-1B

remanded H-1B Case: Automatic Identification Product Manufacturing

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Automatic Identification Product Manufacturing

Decision Summary

The Director denied the petition after concluding the beneficiary did not qualify for an H-1B cap exemption. The AAO withdrew this decision and remanded the case back to the Director for further review and the entry of a new decision.

Criteria Discussed

H-1B Cap Exemption

View Full Decision Text

Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
MATTER OF 1-T-A-S- CORP. DATE: APR. 17, 2017 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, an automatic identification product manufacturer, seeks to temporarily employ the 
Beneficiary as a "project manager" under the H-1 B nonimmigrant classification for specialty 
occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act section 101 (a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. 
§ 1101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding 
that the Beneficiary does not qualify for an H-1B cap exemption. The Petitioner appealed the matter 
to us. 
We hereby withdraw the Director's decision. The matter will be remanded to the Director for further 
review of the Petitioner's claims and for entry of a new decision. 
ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for further 
proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion and for the entry of a new decision. 
Cite as Matter of 1-T-A-S- Corp., ID# 187062 (AAO Apr. 17, 2017)

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.