remanded H-1B

remanded H-1B Case: Civil Engineering

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Civil Engineering

Decision Summary

The director's decision was withdrawn and the case was remanded. The AAO determined that the civil engineer position does qualify as a specialty occupation, contrary to the director's finding. However, the case was remanded to address a new issue: whether the beneficiary is qualified to perform the services, as it appears a state license is required to practice engineering in Texas and the record did not contain evidence of such a license.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation Definition Minimum Degree Requirement Beneficiary Qualifications State Licensure Requirement

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
identifyingdatadeletedto
preventclearlyunwarranted
invasionof personalprivacy
PUBLICCOpy
u.s.Department of Homeland Security
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000
Washington, DC 20529
u.s.Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
"}.." .....
V
MA~ 02 2Ull7
FILE: SRC 05 205 50510 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER Date:
INRE: Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office.
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief
Administrative Appeals Office
www.uscis.gov
SRC 05 205 50510
Page 2
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now
before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The director's decision will be withdrawn. The
petition will be remanded to the director for entry of a new decision.
The petitioner is an engineering consulting company that specializes in accident analysis, root cause failure
analysis and product liability, commercial and vehicle accident reconstruction, industrial fires and explosions,
biomechanical and ergonomics limitations analysis, engineering mechanics and design dynamics, stress analytics,
fracture mechanics and forensic engineering. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as a civil engineer and endeavors
to classify him as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b).
The director denied the petition because the proffered position does not qualify as a specialty occupation. On
appeal the petitioner submits a brief and additional information indicating that the offered position is a specialty
occupation.
The first issue to be discussed in this proceeding is whether the proffered position qualifies as a specialty
occupation.
Section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), provides, in part, for the
classification of qualified nonimmigrant aliens who are coming temporarily to the United States to perform
services in a specialty occupation.
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation
that requires:
(A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and
(B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a
minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States.
The term "specialty occupation" is further defined at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(ii) as:
[A]n occupation which requires theoretical and practical application of a body of highly
specialized knowledge in fields of human endeavor including, but not limited to, architecture,
engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, social sciences, medicine and health, education,
business specialties, accounting, law, theology, and the arts, and which requires the attainment of
a bachelor's degree or higher in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, as a minimum for entry
into the occupation in the United States.
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of
the following criteria:
(1) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement
for entry into the particular position;
.page j
SRC 05 205 50510
Page 3
(2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar
organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is
so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree;
(3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or
(4) The nature of the specific duties are so specialized and complex that knowledge required
to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or
higher degree.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C .F.R.
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is
directly related to the proffered position.
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) the Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2)
the director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the
director's denial letter ; and (5) the Form I-290B with counsel's brief. The AAO reviewed the record in its
entirety before issuing its decision.
The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as a civil engineer. Evidence of the beneficiary's duties
includes the Form 1-129 petition with attachments and the petitioner's response to the director's request for
evidence. According to the evidence the petitioner would:
• Review and analyze foundation damages;
• Prepare scientific evidence in root cause analysis;
• Perform non-destructive testing (defined as compromising test methods used to examine an object,
material or system without impairing its future usefulness, for the purpose of detecting variations in
structure, changes in surface fmish, presence of cracks or other physical discontinuities and to
determine the characteristics of industrial products);
• Prepare written reports for insurance, industrial , and legal firms, and other clients;
The petitioner's business involves the analysis of why structures fail, as well as determining the cause of
accidents or other damage causing events.
The petitioner requires a minimum of a bachelor's degree in engineering for entry into the proffered position .
The AAO routinely consults the U .S. Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook)
for information about the duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. The duties of the
proffered position are essentially those performed by engineers . The Handbook notes that a bachelor's degree
in engineering is required for almost all entry-level engineering jobs. The position does, therefore, qualify as
a specialty occupation as it meets the criterion at 8 C.F .R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(l).
The final issue to be determined is whether the beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the offered
SRC 05 205 50510
Page 4
specialty occupation. The petitioner's foreign education has been determined by a credentials evaluation service
to be equivalent to a bachelor's degree in civil engineering from an accredited college or university in the United
States.
The petition may not be approved, however, as it appears that the beneficiary would be required to have a license
in order to provide services as an engineer. Texas Engineering Practice Act & Rules § 1001.004(c)(2) provides
that engineers in the State of Texas must be licensed. As it appears that the beneficiary will be practicing
engineering without a license, he is not qualified to perform the services of the specialty occupation. The
record does not reflect that the beneficiary would be exempt from the licensure requirements. As the director
did not address this issue, the petition will be remanded in order to determine whether the beneficiary is
qualified to perform the services of the specialty occupation. The director may request such additional
information as she may deem necessary in rendering her decision.
As always, the burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act,
8 U.S.C. § 1361.
ORDER: The director's decision is withdrawn. The petition is remanded to the director for entry of a new
decision commensurate with the directives of this opinion, which, if adverse to the petitioner is to be
certified to the AAO for review.
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.