Remanded
H-1B
H-1B Remanded โ Data Analysis (2022): the petitioner submitted new evidence on appeal,
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the petitioner submitted new evidence on appeal, specifically an expert opinion, that was not before the Director during the initial decision. The AAO determined this new evidence was material to the claim that the proffered position is a specialty occupation and sent the case back for the Director to consider it. The AAO also suggested the Director examine a clause in the employment letter regarding the payment of H-1B fees.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation H-1B Fee Payment
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ