remanded H-1B Case: Education
Decision Summary
The Director limited the petition's validity period because the Beneficiary's teaching license was temporary. On appeal, the Petitioner, a charter school, submitted new evidence showing the Beneficiary was eligible for a state law exemption that extended the deadline to obtain full certification until 2025. Because this new evidence was directly relevant, the AAO remanded the case for the Director to reconsider the appropriate validity period.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 16919651 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: July 6, 2021 The Petitioner , a charter school , seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "middle school teacher" under the H-1 B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S .C. Β§ 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) . The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor 's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the California Service Center approved the petition with a limited validity period . The Director concluded that the record does not establish that the Beneficiary possesses a license to practice in the occupational category for the validity period requested . On appeal , the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred in the decision and submits additional evidence . The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. 1 We review the questions in this matter de novo.2 Upon de nova review , we will remand the petition . Section 214(i)(2)(A) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. Β§ 1184(i)(2)(A) , requires an individual applying for classification as an H-lB nonimmigrant worker to possess "full state licensure to practice in the occupation , if such licensure is required to practice in the occupation. " 8 C.F.R. Β§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(3) . Under 8 C.F.R. Β§ 214.2(h)(4)(v)(E) , the validity period of an approved petition may be limited where the Beneficiary only has a temporary license. The Petitioner filed the instant petition requesting a validity period of March 1, 2021 to February 28, 2024. The Director approved the instant petition with a limited validity period of February 28, 2022 after finding that the Beneficiary has a "temporary /restricted " California state teaching licensure that is valid only until June 1, 2021. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. Β§ 214.2(h)(4)(v)(E), the Director determined that the petition approval must be limited to a year from the validity period start date. 1 Section 291 of the Act; Matter of Chawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). 2 See Matter of Christo 's Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred in limiting the validity date of the petition approval. Specifically, the Petitioner asserts that the Beneficiary meets applicable California teaching licensure law allowing teachers previously "employed by charter schools during the 2019-20 school year ... until July 1, 2025, to obtain the certificate required for the teacher's certificated assignment." 3 In support of this assertion, the Petitioner provides evidence of its status as a charter school, a copy of a receipt showing the Beneficiary submitted a teaching certification renewal application, excerpts from the California Education Code, and a letter froml I Office of Education verifying the credential exemption until 2025. Because the new evidence is directly relevant to the Director's ground for limiting the validity period of the approved petition, we will remand the matter for farther consideration. Upon remand, the Director should consider the new evidence submitted relevant to the Petitioner's status as a charter school, California teacher licensing requirements, and the Beneficiary's qualifications, along with evidence the Petitioner previously submitted, to determine the appropriate validity period for the approved Petition. ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for the entry of a new decision consistent with the foregoing analysis. 3 Cal. Educ. CodeΒ§ 47605.4(a) 2
Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.