Remanded
H-1B
H-1B Remanded — Education (2005): the director initially denied the petition because the
Decision Summary
The director initially denied the petition because the beneficiary's education was deemed unrelated to the proffered position of senior admissions officer. The AAO found the beneficiary was qualified but remanded the case because the director had failed to address the more fundamental issue of whether the position itself qualifies as a specialty occupation, noting that the petitioner's evidence suggested a degree in a specific specialty was not actually required.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary'S Qualifications For A Specialty Occupation Position'S Qualification As A Specialty Occupation 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(C) 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →