remanded
H-1B
remanded H-1B Case: Environmental Testing
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because a new court decision (Itserve Alliance, Inc. v. Cissna) led to the rescission of prior USCIS policy guidance regarding H-1B workers employed at third-party worksites. The case was sent back to the Director for reconsideration in light of the new policy.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Third-Party Worksite
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 10979842 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: SEP. 01, 2020 The Petitioner, an environmental testing laboratory and services company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-lB non immigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the evidence of record does not establish that the Beneficiary would perform services in a specialty occupation for the requested period of intended employment. While this appeal was pending, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision in ltserve Alliance, Inc. v. Cissna, 443 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.D.C. 2020). Subsequently, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) rescinded previously issued policy guidance relating to H-lB petitions filed for workers who will be employed at one or more third-party worksites.1 The matter is now before us on appeal. Because this case is affected by the new policy guidance, we find it appropriate to remand the matter for the Director to consider the question anew and to adjudicate in the first instance any additional issues as may be necessary and appropriate. Accordingly, the following order shall be issued. ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the foregoing analysis and entry of a new decision. 1 USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0114, Rescission of Policy Memoranda at 2 (June 17, 2020), http://www.uscis.gov/legal-resource s/policy-memoranda.
Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.