remanded
H-1B
remanded H-1B Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, concluding the evidence was insufficient to establish that the 'solution developer' position qualified as a specialty occupation. The petitioner submitted additional evidence on appeal, including project reports and contracts. The AAO remanded the matter for the Director to consider the new evidence and issue a new decision.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 10158756 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: AUG . 13, 2020 The Petitioner, an information technology solutions provider, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "solution developer" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the Beneficiary will perform services in a specialty occupation for a requested period of intended employment, and therefore, the proffered position did not qualify as a specialty occupation. Upon de nova review, we will remand the matter for the entry of a new decision. The Petitioner submits additional evidence on appeal including project progress reports, invoices, and contracts. The Petitioner asserts that the evidence submitted establishes eligibility. Because the Director has not yet addressed the additional evidence, we shall return the matter for the Director to consider the Petitioner's claim anew. ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for the entry of a new decision.
Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.