Remanded
H-1B
H-1B Remanded โ Information Technology (2023): the case was remanded for two reasons
Decision Summary
The case was remanded for two reasons. First, the Director did not consider evidence that the Beneficiary may have reset their six-year limit by residing outside the U.S. for the immediate prior year, potentially entitling them to the full validity period requested. Second, the AAO determined the record contained insufficient detail about the job duties to establish that the proffered 'OMS-WMS Developer' position qualifies as a specialty occupation.
Criteria Discussed
Maximum Period Of Stay Specialty Occupation
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ