Remanded
H-1B
H-1B Remanded โ Information Technology (2020): the Director's decision was insufficient for review
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision was insufficient for review. The Director incorrectly focused on the beneficiary's qualifications without first determining whether the proffered position qualified as a specialty occupation. The AAO found the evidence, such as the Statements of Work, was insufficient to establish the substantive nature of the work at the time of filing and returned the case for a new decision.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Beneficiary Qualifications Eligibility At Time Of Filing
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ