Remanded
H-1B
H-1B Remanded — It Consulting (2024): the Director's decision to revoke the H-1B petition was not
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director's decision to revoke the H-1B petition was not adequately explained. The Director concluded that a change in the beneficiary's end-client resulted in a material change in job duties but failed to specify how or why these changes were material. The AAO found that without a clear explanation, the revocation was unsupported and remanded the case for a new decision with proper analysis.
Criteria Discussed
Revocation For Beneficiary No Longer Employed In Specified Capacity (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(11)(Iii)(A)(1)) Material Change In Terms And Conditions Of Employment Specialty Occupation Definition (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A))
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →