Remanded H-1B

H-1B Remanded โ€” It Consulting (2020): the decision was remanded because the Director's denial was

๐Ÿ“… 2020-08-26 ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ It Consulting

Decision Summary

The decision was remanded because the Director's denial was deemed insufficient for review. The Director failed to follow the legal standard set by Defensor v. Meissner, which requires evaluating the job requirements of the end-client, not just the petitioning consulting firm. The matter was sent back for the Director to properly analyze whether the end-client's position qualifies as a specialty occupation and then re-evaluate the beneficiary's qualifications.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation Beneficiary Qualifications End-Client Job Requirements Wage Level
๐Ÿ“„ Original decision (USCIS PDF)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft

Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.

Browse Decisions โ†’