remanded H-1B

remanded H-1B Case: Market Analysis

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Market Analysis

Decision Summary

The Director denied the H-1B extension petition but failed to explain the specific reasons for the denial in writing, as required by regulation. The petitioner appealed requesting clarification, and the AAO agreed, remanding the case for further review and a new, properly explained decision.

Criteria Discussed

H-1B Extension Eligibility

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
MATTER OF F-C-0-A- DATE: JUNE 24,2016 
APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER 
The Petitioner, a fulfillment services business, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a 
"market analyst" under the H -1 B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section IOI(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 110l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-IB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a 
qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application 
of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degr~e in 
the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director, California Service Center, denied the petition. The Director concluded that the 
Beneficiary was not eligible for an extension in accordance with the applicable provisions. 
The matter is now before us on appeal. In its appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Beneficiary is 
eligible for an extension of H -1 B classification. The regulation at 8 C.F .R. ยง I 03 .2(b )( 19) states that 
the Director will notify a petitioner in writing of a decision made on a benefit request. Further, 
8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(l)(i) states that when denying a petition, the Director shall explain in writing the 
specific reasons for denial. In the appeal, the Petitioner requests that the Director clarify the basis 
for the denial of the petition. We agree. Therefore, the petition will be remanded to the Director for 
further review and clarification. 
ORDER: The decision of the Director, California Service Center, is withdrawnยท. The matter is 
remanded to the Director, California Service Center, for further proceedings 
consistent with the foregoing opinion and for the entry of a new decision. 
Cite as Matter of F-C-0-A -, ID# 17141 (AAO June 24, 20 16) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.