remanded H-1B

remanded H-1B Case: Marketing And Communications

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Marketing And Communications

Decision Summary

The Director's decision denying the petition was withdrawn and the case was remanded. The reason for the remand was a new, intervening court decision (Innova Sols., Inc. v. Baran) that impacted the analysis of whether the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation, requiring the Director to reconsider the case in light of this new precedent.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 10273292 
Appeal of California Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: MAR. 29, 2021 
The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as an "agency communication and marketing 
analyst" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. Immigration and 
Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB 
program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that 
requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge 
and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a 
minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not 
establish that the proffered position is a specialty occupation, and the Petitioner filed a timely appeal. 
While the appeal was pending, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision in 
lnnova Sols., Inc. v. Baran, 983 F.3d 428 (9th Cir. 2020). Because the analysis utilized by the Director 
in arriving at her conclusion on the specialty-occupation issue appears impacted by that decision, we 
find it appropriate to remand the matter for the Director to consider the question anew, and to 
adjudicate in the first instance any additional issues as may be necessary and appropriate. 
Accordingly, the following order shall be issued. 
ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for further 
proceedings consistent with the foregoing analysis and entry of a new decision. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.