remanded
H-1B
remanded H-1B Case: Software Development
Decision Summary
The case was remanded because new policy guidance was issued regarding the employer-employee relationship following a district court decision. The AAO determined the Director should reconsider this issue under the new guidance. The AAO also instructed the Director to evaluate whether the beneficiary is qualified, as the record lacked a proper evaluation of the beneficiary's foreign degree.
Criteria Discussed
Employer-Employee Relationship Beneficiary Qualifications Foreign Degree Equivalency Specialty Occupation Availability Of Work
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 10108970 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: AUG. 03, 2020 The Petitioner, a software development and consulting company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. Β§ l 10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish an employer-employee relationship with the Beneficiary. While this appeal was pending, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision in Itserve Alliance, Inc. v. Cissna, --- F.Supp.3d---, 2020 WL 1150186 (D.D.C. 2020) . Subsequently, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) rescinded previously issued policy guidance and directed its officers to apply the existing regulatory definition at 8 C.F .R. Β§ 214.2(h)(4)(ii) to assess whether a petitioner and a beneficiary have an employer-employee relationship. USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0114, Rescission of Policy Memoranda at 2 (June 17, 2020), http://www.uscis.gov /legal-resources /policyΒ memoranda. Because this case is affected by the new policy guidance, we find it appropriate to remand the matter for the Director to consider the question anew and to adjudicate in the first instance any additional issues as may be necessary and appropriate. Additionally, regardless of whether the Petitioner would have an employer-employee relationship with the Beneficiary and whether sufficient work would be available , the Director should determine whether the Beneficiary is qualified to perform services in a specialty occupation. Specifically, the record does not contain an evaluation of the Beneficiary's foreign degree or sufficient evidence to establish that his foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree in a specific specialty. Accordingly, the following order shall be issued. ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for farther proceedings consistent with the foregoing analysis and entry of a new decision. 2
Draft your H-1B petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.