sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Accounting

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Accounting

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined the proposed 'operations accountant' position was a specialty occupation. The director initially denied the petition, believing the duties were more aligned with a bookkeeper and that the petitioner's pharmacy was not complex enough. However, the AAO found that the position's tax-related and auditing responsibilities, especially within a highly regulated industry with complex Medicare/Medicaid billing, were sufficiently complex to require a bachelor's degree in accounting.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(1) 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(2) 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(3) 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(4)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
identifying data deleted to 
prevent cIezi!y unwarranted 
invasion of persod pri08cy 
PUBLIC copy 
U.S. Department of Ilomeland Security 
20 Mass Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
FILE: WAC 04 2 16 52465 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 
PETITION: 
 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lOl(a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 10 1 (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Wdministrative Appeals Office 
WAC 04 216 52465 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter was appealed 
to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be approved. 
The petitioner is a pharmacy that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a part-time operations accountant and to 
classify him as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 10l(a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 101(a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition on the basis that the proposed position is not a specialty occupation. On 
appeal, counsel submits a brief and additional evidence. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1184 (i)(l), defines the term 
"specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: 
(A) 
 theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and 
(B) 
 attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) 
as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the 
following criteria: 
(I) 
 A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement 
for entry into the particular position; 
(2) 
 The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar 
organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is 
so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 
(3) 
 The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) 
 The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required 
to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or 
higher degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any bachelor's or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is 
directly related to the proposed position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the 
director's request for evidence (RFE); (3) the petitioner's response to the RFE; (4) the director's denial letter; 
and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before 
issuing its decision. 
The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as an operations accountant. Evidence of the beneficiary's 
duties includes: the 1-129 petition; the company's support letter; the petitioner's response to the director's 
WAC 04 2 16 52465 
Page 3 
RFE; and counsel's brief on appeal. According to this evidence, the beneficiary would perform duties that 
entail, in part: providing accounting, auditing, profit, and cost analysis, and tax reporting, as well as preparing 
financial statements. The petitioner indicated that it required an individual who possessed a bachelor's degree 
with a major in accounting or its equivalent. 
The director stated that many of the proposed duties reflect those of an accountant as that occupation is 
described in the Department of Labor's (DOL) Occupational Outlook Handbook (the Handbook), but that 
sole reliance on duties resembling those of an accountant as that occupation is described in the Handbook is 
misplaced. The director discussed the Handbook's description of accountants, and stated that the petitioner 
does not have the organizational complexity, scale of business, or engage in the type of business to require the 
services of a part or full-time accountant. The director also found that the proposed duties more closely 
resembled those of a bookkeeper, not an accountant. The director stated that since the petitioner did not 
employ financial clerks, an occupation that does not qualify as a specialty occupation, the beneficiary would 
perform these duties. The director stated that the evidence is insufficient to show that the proposed duties 
could not be performed by an experienced person whose educational training falls short of a bachelor's 
degree. The director concluded that the petitioner failed to establish any of the criteria under 8 C.F.R. 
5 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). 
Counsel asserts that the petitioner's pharmacists and technicians, not the beneficiary, will perform basic 
bookkeeping and clerical tasks as each sale is made. Counsel asserts that, due to its high volume of business, 
the petitioner needs the beneficiary's part-time services to provide monthly analysis of cost and profit. 
Counsel asserts that the petitioner's tax returns, submitted in response to the RFE, establish the complexity of 
the petitioner's financial operations. 
The AAO agrees that the record establishes that the proposed position is an accountant, and is a specialty 
occupation. 
The petitioner need only satisfy one of the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to establish that a position is 
a specialty occupation. Upon a thorough review of the record, the AAO concludes that the petitioner has 
established that the proposed position meets the criterion outlined in 8 C.F.R. $214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I) - a 
bachelor's or higher degree or its equivalent is the normal minimum requirement for entry into the particular 
position. 
An important factor CIS considers, to determine whether or not this criterion has been met, is whether the 
Handbook reports that the industry requires at least a bachelor's degree in a specific field of study. The AAO 
routinely consults the Handbook for its information about the duties and educational requirements of particular 
occupations. The Handbook states that for a management accountant, the field of accountancy most closely 
aligned with the proffered position, a bachelor's degree in accounting or a related field is required. 
The AAO finds the record to establish that the duties of the proposed position as those of a management 
accountant and to require a bachelor's degree in accounting or a related field. The evidence establishes the 
petitioner as a business grossing more than $3 million annually. While this level of income does not 
demonstrate that the performance of all of the duties described by the petitioner would be at the level of a 
degreed accountant, the AAO finds that, in a highly regulated industry with complex Medicare and Medicaid 
reporting and billing requirements, the position's tax-related and auditing responsibilities are of sufficient 
complexity to impose a bachelor's degree requirement in accounting or a directly related field on the 
WAC 04 216 52465 
Page 4 
beneficiary. 
 Therefore, the petitioner has established the proposed position as a specialty occupation under 
the requirements at 8 C.F.R. 
 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I). The director's finding to the contrary is withdrawn. 
The beneficiary passed the Uniform Certified Public Accountant (CPA) Examination in California, an 
examination that requires those taking it to have a bachelor's degree, 24 credit hours of accounting and 24 
credit hours of business-related subjects.' He also possesses a master's degree in intern 
the University of California San Diego and a bachelor's degree in economics from the 
University in Seoul, Korea. The beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of a degree 
C.F.R. ยง214.2(h)(4)(iii)(~)(3). 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1361. The petitioner has sustained that burden. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is sustained. The director's order is withdrawn and the petition is approved. 
1 
 California Board of Accountancy's Uniform CPA Examination Handbook: First-Time Applicants. This 
handbook can be accessed on the Internet at www.dca.ca.gov/cba~forms/exambkl .pdf. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.