sustained H-1B Case: Accounting
Decision Summary
The director denied the petition, concluding the position was for a bookkeeper, not a specialty occupation. The AAO sustained the appeal, determining that the proffered role was indeed an accountant position. It found that the position qualified as a specialty occupation because, according to the Occupational Outlook Handbook, a bachelor's degree in accounting is a normal minimum requirement for entry into such a role.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
identifling data deleted to prevent clearly unwananted invmion of maal privacy PUBLIC COPY U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: WAC 03 143 50648 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 2 E h1jl4t, PETITION: Petition for a Nonirnmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. Robert @d""zw P. Wiemann, Direct u Administrative Appeals Office WAC 03 143 50648 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonirnmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be approved. The petitioner is a telecommunications provider that seeks to employ the beneficiary as an accountant. The petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonirnrnigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). The director denied the petition because the proffered position is not a specialty occupation. On appeal, counsel submits a brief. Section 214(i)(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires: (A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and (B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the following criteria: (1) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; (2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; (3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or (4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the proffered position. The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the director's denial letter; and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in its entirety before issuing its decision. WAC 03 143 50648 Page 3 The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as an acco t. Evidence of the beneficiary's duties includes: the 1-129 petition; the petitioner's March 24, 200 er in support of the petition; and the petitioner's response to the director's request for evidence. Acc to this evidence, the beneficiary would perform duties that entail, in part: preparing the company's ge edger and monthly and yearly financial reports; compiling and analyzing financial information; detai e petitioner's accounts receivable and reducing the aging period; advising on the advantages and d tages of various business decisions or transactions; devising a financial system that will help the p establish a more systematic accounts receivable system; auditing contracts, orders and vouchers a ring reports to substantiate individual transactions prior to settlement; and establishing, mo documenting and coordinating the implementation of accounting and accounting control proce e petitioner indicated that a qualified candidate for the job would possess a bachelor's degree in ac The director found that the proffered position was not a specialty ccupation because the position is that of a bookkeeper or accounting clerk. !' On appeal, counsel states that the proffered position is an account nt, and not a bookkeeper. Counsel asserts that the director acknowledged that many of the duties of the prof ered position were those of an accountant, and that an accountant position is a specialty occupation. Counsel urther asserts that the inconsistency noted by the director, that the petitioner appeared to have a CPA on its staff, is inaccurate. The petitioner uses a CPA during tax season, but does not have an accountant on taff. Counsel states that the director's determination that the petitioner is not the type of business that w uld need an in-house accountant is based on conjecture rather than fact. 1 The AAO agrees with counsel that a position as an accountant is g nerally a specialty occupation and that the proffered position is an accountant. Upon review of the record, the petitioner has established one of the four criteria outlined in 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Therefore, the proffered position is a specialt 1 occupation. The AAO turns first to the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 5 )(I) and (2): a baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is the normal minimum into the particular position; a degree requirement is common to the industry in similar organizations; or a particular position is so complex or unique that it can with a degree. Factors often considered by CIS when determining these criteria whether the Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook) reports that the a degree; whether the industry's professional association has made a degree a minimum entry whether letters or affidavits from fms or individuals in the industry attest that such firms only degreed individuals." See Shanti, lnc. v. Reno, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 Corp. v. Suva, 764 F. Supp. 1095,1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). The petitioner is a telecommunications company that reports a annual income of approximately $2 million, and a high volume of business, with multiple vendors The evidence of record WAC 03 143 50648 Page 4 establishes the proffered position as that type of accounting position for which the Handbook reports that a bachelor's degree in accounting or a related specialty is a normal minimum hiring requirement. Therefore, the evidence establishes that the proffered position is a specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(l). The beneficiary has a bachelor's degree in accounting from a foreign college, which a credentials evaluation company determined was equivalent to a bachelor's degree in business administration with a concentration in accounting from a United States university. The beneficiary is qualified to perform the services of an accountant. The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1361. The petitioner has sustained that burden. Accordingly, the appeal will be sustained and the petition will be approved. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. The director's order is withdrawn and the petition is approved.
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.