sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Accounting

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Accounting

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the position was a bookkeeper rather than an accountant. The AAO found that the accountant position is a specialty occupation, citing the Occupational Outlook Handbook which indicates a bachelor's degree is the normal minimum requirement. Additionally, an evaluation established that the beneficiary's foreign degree and experience were equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree in accounting, proving the beneficiary was qualified.

Criteria Discussed

Normal Degree Requirement For Position Industry Standard Degree Requirement Employer'S Normal Degree Requirement Specialized And Complex Duties Requiring A Degree Beneficiary'S Qualifications

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
PUBLIC COPY 
FILE: WAC 02 234 53760 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: MAR 2 1 2o06 
IN RE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
PETITION: 
 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 l (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
&/4d'dL 
$0 Robert P. Wiemann, D' ecto 
V 
 Administrative Appeals we 
WAC 02 234 53760 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before 
the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be sustained. 
The petitioner sells and markets used vehicles. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as a part-time accountant. 
The petitioner endeavors to classify the beneficiary as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant 
to 3 lOl(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition because the proffered position is not a specialty occupation and the 
beneficiary is not qualified to perform a specialty occupation. On appeal, counsel submits a brief. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation 
that requires: 
(A) 
 theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and 
(B) 
 attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) 
as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of 
the following criteria: 
(I) 
 A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement 
for entry into the particular position; 
(2) 
 The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar 
organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is 
so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 
(3) 
 The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) 
 The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge required to 
perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher 
degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is 
directly related to the proffered position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the 
director's request for additional evidence; (3) the petitioner's response to the director's request; (4) the 
director's denial letter; and (5) Form I-290B and supporting documentation. The AAO reviewed the record in 
its entirety before issuing its decision. 
The petitioner is seeking the beneficiary's services as a part-time accountant. Evidence of the beneficiary's 
duties includes: the 1-129 petition; the petitioner's June 26, 2002 letter in support of the petition; and the 
petitioner's response to the director's request for evidence. According to this evidence, the beneficiary would 
WAC 02 234 53760 
Page 3 
perform duties that entail: preparing general ledger and monthlylyearly reports; monitoring information 
systems; preparing entries to company accounts; detailing company assets, liabilities, and capital; advising 
and recommending tax strategies to management; advising on the advantages and disadvantages of business 
decisions and transactions; performing accounting and inventory of supplies; devising a financial system that 
will improve inventory procedures; preparing balance sheets, profit-and-loss statements, checks, tax 
remittances, and financial reports; discussing financial matters with management; modifying and coordinating 
the implementation of accounting and accounting control procedures; monitoring the budget, performance 
evaluation, and cost-and-asset management; and preparing correspondence for clients. The petitioner 
indicated that the beneficiary is a qualified candidate for the job because he possesses a foreign bachelor's 
degree in commerce with a major in banking and finance. 
The director found that the proffered position was not a specialty occupation because the job is primarily that 
of a bookkeeper. Citing to the Department of Labor's (DOL) Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook), 
2002-2003 edition, the director noted that the minimum requirement for entry into the position was not a 
baccalaureate degree or its equivalent in a specific specialty. The director found further that the petitioner 
failed to establish any of the criteria found at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). 
On appeal, counsel states, in part, that the proffered position is that of an accountant, and is not a bookkeeper 
or accounting clerk position. Counsel states further that the proposed duties, which entail monitoring the 
petitioner's finances and information systems, require specialized knowledge and training in accounting. 
The AAO disagrees with the director's finding that the proffered position is not a specialty occupation and the 
beneficiary is not qualified to perform a specialty occupation. In this case, the proffered position is that of an 
accountant for the petitioning entity, which sells and markets used vehicles and has 15 employees and a gross 
annual income of $12,500,880. A review of the Handbook, 2006-2007 edition, finds that most accountant and 
auditor positions require at least a bachelor's degree in accounting or a related field. The beneficiary in this 
case holds a foreign bachelor's degree in commerce with a major in banking and finance, and has several 
years of related experience. An evaluator, who is an official with authority to grant college-level credit for 
training and/or experience in the specialty at an accredited college or university which has a program for 
granting such credit based on an individual's training and/or work experience, has determined that the 
beneficiary's educational background and employment experience are the equivalent of a bachelor's degree in 
accounting from a regionally accredited college or university in the United States. As such, the petitioner has 
overcome the director's objections. In view of the foregoing, it is concluded that the petitioner has 
demonstrated that the proffered position is a specialty occupation within the meaning of regulations and that 
the beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the specialty occupation. 
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 
5 1361. The petitioner has sustained that burden. Accordingly, the appeal will be sustained and the petition 
will be approved. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is sustained. The director's order is withdrawn and the petition is approved. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.