sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Advertising/Design

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Advertising/Design

Decision Summary

The director denied the petition, finding the proffered role of 'website designer' did not qualify as a specialty occupation. The AAO sustained the appeal, agreeing with the petitioner that the position's duties were more aligned with a 'web graphic designer.' The AAO determined the duties were sufficiently specialized and complex to meet the criteria for a specialty occupation and that the beneficiary's qualifications were appropriate for the role.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A) 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(C)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
raentliipmg data 
pmvent clearly unwasran ked 
invasion of persond privacy 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
l?n,E: WAC 04 192 50782 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: 2 0 7-886 
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S .C. $ 1 lOl(a)( lS)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All materials have been returned 
to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
- 
d 
Jd Ri?!%.%~~w Administrative Appeals 
WAC 04 192 50782 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimrnigrant visa petition. The matter is now on 
appeal before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be 
approved. 
The petitioner is an advertisingldesign company. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as a website designer 
and to classify him as a nonirnrnigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 
lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition on the ground that the record failed to establish that the proffered position 
qualifies as a specialty occupation. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an 
occupation that requires: 
(A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, 
and 
(B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its 
equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
As provided in 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation the position must meet 
one of the following criteria: 
(I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum 
requirement for entry into the particular position; 
(2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among 
similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its 
particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an 
individual with a degree; 
(3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge 
required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a 
baccalaureate or higher degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty 
that is directly related to the proffered position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains (I) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) the 
director's notice of intent to deny (NOID); (3) the petitioner's response to the NOID; (4) the notice of 
decision; and (5) Form I-290B, an appeal brief, and supporting materials. The AAO reviewed the record 
in its entirety before issuing its decision. 
WAC 04 192 50782 
Page 4 
petition. The director found that the proffered position did not qualify as a specialty occupation under 
any of the criteria enumerated in the regulation at 8 C.F.R 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). 
On appeal counsel asserts that the director erred in finding that the proffered position is that of a web 
designer, rather that a web graphic designer. Counsel maintains that the categorization of the position as 
a web graphic designer in the petitioner's response to the NOID is consistent with the duties of the 
position set forth in the original job description, and therefore does not represent a material change to or 
amendment of the petition. In counsel's view, the duties of the proffered position more closely resemble 
those of a graphic designer, as described in the Handbook, than they do the narrower occupation of web 
designer. According to counsel, the proffered position meets all four alternative criteria of a specialty 
occupation at 8 C.F.R 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). 
The AAO agrees with counsel that adding "graphic" to the position's title in the response to the NOID did 
not materially change the petition because it simply reflects the duties of the position originally described 
by the petitioner. Accordingly, there has been no amendment to the petition. 
In determining whether a position meets the statutory and regulatory criteria of a specialty occupation, 
CIS routinely consults the DOL Handbook as an authoritative source of information about the duties and 
educational requirements of particular occupations. Factors typically considered are whether the 
Handbook indicates a degree is required by the industry; whether the industry's professional association 
has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from firms or 
individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals." 
See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F.Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 (D.Minn. 1999) (quoting HirdBlaker Coip. v. Sava, 
712 F.Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). CIS also analyzes the specific duties and complexity of the 
position at issue, with the Handbook's occupational descriptions as a reference, as well as the petitioner's 
past hiring practices for the position. See Shanti, Znc. v. Reno, id., at 1165-66. 
Graphic designers, an occupational sub-category of designers, are described in the Handbook, 2004-05 
edition, at 242: 
Graphic designers plan, analyze, and create visual solutions to communications 
problems. They use a variety of print, electronic, and film media and technologies to 
execute a design that meet clients' communication needs. They consider cognitive, 
cultural, physical, and social factors in planning and executing designs appropriate for a 
given context. Graphic designers use computer software to develop the overall layout 
and production design of magazines, newspapers, journals, corporate reports, and other 
publications. They also produce promotional displays and marketing brochures for 
products and services, design distinctive logos for products and businesses, and develop 
signs and signage systems - called environmental graphics - for business and 
government. An increasing number of graphic designers are developing material for 
Internet Web pages, computer interfaces, and multimedia projects. Graphic designers 
also produce the credits that appear before and after television programs and movies. 
The AAO determines that the duties of the proffered position are reflected in the foregoing occupational 
description, especially in its reference to graphic designers developing material for Internet Web pages. 
Based on the petitioner's description of the proffered position, the other documentation of record, and the 
WAC 04 192 50782 
Page 5 
)i 
Handbook information quoted above, the AAO concludes that the web graphic designer position at issue 
in this petition is a type of graphic designer. The AAO also concludes that the proffered position qualifies 
as a specialty occupation under the regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4) because the duties of 
the position are so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually 
associated with a baccalaureate or higher degree in a job-related specialty. 
To be qualified to perform services in a specialty occupation, the beneficiary must meet one of the 
following criteria enumerated in 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C): 
(I) Hold a United States baccalaureate or higher degree required by the specialty 
occupation from an accredited college or university; 
(2) Hold a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a United States 
baccalaureate or higher degree required by the specialty occupation from an 
accredited college or university; 
(3) Hold an unrestricted State license, registration or certification which authorizes 
him or her to fully practice the specialty occupation and be immediately engaged 
in that specialty in the state of intended employment; or 
(4) Have education, specialized training, and/or progressively responsible experience 
that is equivalent to completion of a United States baccalaureate or higher degree 
in the specialty occupation, and have recognition of expertise in the specialty 
through progressively responsible positions directly related to the specialty. 
As previously indicated, the beneficiary has a bachelor of arts degree in advertising from Pepperdine 
University in Malibu, California. The record includes the beneficiary's transcript from the university 
showing that her coursework included advertising fundamentals, advertising media, communication graphics, 
advertising copywriting and layout, advertising research, advertising campaign management, graphic design, 
computer animation, and advanced computer graphics. The AAO determines that all of these courses are 
directly related to, and required by, the proffered position of web graphic designer. The AAO concludes, 
therefore that the beneficiary qualifies under 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(l) to perform the services of the 
specialty occupation. 
Thus, the record establishes that the proffered position is a specialty occupation and that the beneficiary is 
qualified to perform the services of that occupation. 
The petitioner bears the burden of proof in these proceedings. See section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1361. 
The petitioner has met that burden. Accordingly, the AAO will sustain the appeal and approve the petition. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. The petition is approved. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.