Sustained
H-1B
H-1B Sustained โ Architecture: the director denied the H-1B extension, believing the
Decision Summary
The director denied the H-1B extension, believing the beneficiary had exhausted her six years in H status by incorrectly including time spent as an H-4 dependent. The AAO sustained the appeal based on a recent CIS policy memorandum clarifying that time spent in H-4 status does not count against the six-year maximum period of admission for H-1B principals. This recalculation made the beneficiary eligible for the extension.
Criteria Discussed
H-1B Six-Year Limit Ac21 Extension Eligibility 365-Day Rule For Labor Certification Counting Of Time In H-4 Status
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ