Sustained
H-1B
H-1B Sustained โ Automotive Engineering (2005): the director incorrectly determined that the beneficiary's
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the director incorrectly determined that the beneficiary's labor certification application had been denied. The AAO found that the director misinterpreted a denial of a 'reduction in recruitment' request as a denial of the entire application. Because the labor certification was, in fact, still pending, the beneficiary was eligible for an H-1B extension beyond the six-year limit under the provisions of AC21.
Criteria Discussed
H-1B Extension Beyond 6 Years Ac21 Eligibility Pending Labor Certification
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ