sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Chemistry
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to establish the proffered position of "chemist (manufacturing associate)" qualifies as a specialty occupation. The petitioner submitted a detailed job description and adequately explained the complexity and specialized nature of the duties, proving the role requires at least a bachelor's degree in a specific field.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(4)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 5644250 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-18) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: AUG . 25, 2020 The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "chemist (manufacturing associate)" under the H-18 nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-18 program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the evidence of record does not establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. Upon de nova review, we will sustain the appeal. The evidence of record establishes that the proffered position requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and that it is so complex and specialized that it can be performed only by an individual with at least a bachelor's degree in specific specialty, or the equivalent. Specifically, the Petitioner provided a sufficiently detailed job description and explained why the position is complex and specialized. Therefore, we conclude that the evidence of record satisfies the criterion at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). The Petitioner has also established that the proffered position qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as defined by section 214(i)(l) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). ORDER: The appeal is sustained.
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.