sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Civil Engineering
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, finding the Beneficiary was not qualified for the civil engineer position. The appeal was sustained because the AAO, upon de novo review, determined that the Beneficiary's foreign degree, based on its specific coursework, is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree required for the specialty occupation.
Criteria Discussed
Beneficiary Qualifications Foreign Degree Equivalency
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 7282929 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date : FEB. 27, 2020 The Petitioner, a general engineering company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "civil engineer" under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Beneficiary is not qualified for the proffered position. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred . Upon de nova review, we conclude that the record, including information submitted on appeal, establishes that the particular coursework for the foreign degree held by the Beneficiary supports the determination that the degree is equivalent to a United States bachelor's degree required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college or university. Therefore, the record satisfies the criterion at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(2). Further, the record satisfies the criterion at section 214(i)(2)(B) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(i)(2)(B). 1 ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 1 We note that the requirements at section 214(i)(2)(A) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(3) do not appear to apply to the particular position .
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.