sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Construction

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Construction

Decision Summary

The director initially denied the petition, finding the proffered position of contract administrator did not qualify as a specialty occupation because it did not uniformly require a bachelor's degree. The petitioner successfully appealed by providing additional evidence, including numerous job advertisements and letters from other construction companies, demonstrating that a degree in business administration is a common requirement for such a position within the construction industry.

Criteria Discussed

A Baccalaureate Or Higher Degree Or Its Equivalent Is Normally The Minimum Requirement For Entry Into The Particular Position The Degree Requirement Is Common To The Industry In Parallel Positions Among Similar Organizations Or The Position Is So Complex Or Unique That It Can Be Performed Only By An Individual With A Degree The Employer Normally Requires A Degree Or Its Equivalent For The Position The Nature Of The Specific Duties Is So Specialized And Complex That Knowledge Required To Perform The Duties Is Usually Associated With The Attainment Of A Baccalaureate Or Higher Degree

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: SRC 04 001 50436 Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER 
 Date: JUL 1 7 2906 
PETITION: 
 Petition for a Nonirnrnigrant Worker Pursuant to Section lOl(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 10 l(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All materials have been returned 
to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
SRC 04 001 50436 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition. The matter is now on 
appeal before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be 
approved. 
The petitioner is a construction company. It seeks to employ the beneficiary as a contract administrator and 
to extend his classification as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 
lOl(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition on the ground that the record did not establish that the proffered position 
qualifies as a specialty occupation. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an 
occupation that requires: 
(A) 
 theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, 
and 
(B) 
 attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its 
equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
To qualify as a specialty occupation the position must meet one of the following criteria enumerated at 
8 C.F.R. 9 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A): 
(I) 
 A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum 
requirement for entry into the particular position; 
(2) 
 The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among 
similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its 
particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an 
individual with a degree; 
(3) 
 The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) 
 The nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that knowledge 
required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a 
baccalaureate or higher degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
ยง 214,2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty 
that is directly related to the proffered position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) 
the director's request for evidence (RFE); (3) the petitioner's response to the RFE; (4) the notice of 
decision; and (5) Form I-290B, an appeal brief, and supporting materials. The AAO reviewed the record 
in its entirety before issuing its decision. 
, SRC 04 001 50436 
Page 3 
The petitioner is a construction company engaged in the field of housing construction. The petitioner 
states that it was established in 1998, achieved a gross income of $2.8 million by 2001 and $3.5 million 
by 2003, and had five employees at the time the instant petition was filed. In a letter accompanying the 
Form 1-129 the petitioner indicated that it needed a contract administrator to manage its construction 
projects, which numbered ten at the time, and proposed to hire the beneficiary for three years at an annual 
salary of $3 1,000. The duties of the position were described as follows: 
[The beneficiary] will direct activities concerned with construction contracts, including 
leasing of and purchase of equipment, materials, and products. He will also manage the 
contractual relationships for the construction projects, including those with 
subcontractors. [The beneficiary] will examine performance requirements, delivery 
schedules, and estimates of costs of material, equipment, and production to ensure 
completeness and accuracy. He will prepare bids, process specifications, test and 
progress reports, and other exhibits that may be required. He will review bids from other 
firms for conformity to contract requirements and determine acceptable bids. [The 
beneficiary] will negotiate contracts with bidders, vendors and other suppliers. He will 
also request and approve amendments to or extensions of contracts. [The beneficiary] 
will also be in charge of advising the planning and other departments of contractual rights 
and obligations. 
According to the petitioner, the minimum educational requirement for the position is a bachelor's degree 
in business administration. As evidence thereof the petitioner has submitted numerous internet job 
advertisements for contract administrator positions. The beneficiary is qualified for the proffered 
position, the petitioner declares, based on his completion of a ten-semester program of business 
administration at the Corporacion Universitaria de la Costa in Barranquilla, Colombia, in the years 1981- 
1985, for which he was granted a diploma on June 28, 1986. A report submitted with the petition from an 
educational credentials evaluation service, the Foundation for International Services, Inc. ("FIS"), 
declares that the beneficiary's diploma is equivalent to a bachelor's degree in business administration 
from an accredited college or university in the United States. 
In response to the RFE the petitioner submitted a revised report from FIS which, after taking into account 
the beneficiary's nine years of work as a contract administrator in Colombia, declared that the 
beneficiary's education and experience is equivalent to a bachelor's degree in business administration 
with a concentration in contract administration from an accredited U.S. college or university. The 
petitioner submitted an excerpt from the Department of Labor (D0L)'s Occupational Outlook Handbook 
(Handbook) on administrative services managers which states that "[mlanagers of highly complex 
services, such as contract administration, generally need at least a bachelor's degree in business, human 
resources or finance," as well as letters from two other construction companies in Miami, Florida, stating 
that they require their contract administrators to have a bachelor's degree in business administration or the 
equivalent. The petitioner pointed out that the beneficiary was previously granted H-1B status in 
February 2001 pursuant to a petition filed by a pool service company in Miami, and cited a CIS policy 
memorandum on the adjudication of extension petitions as authority for the claim that the instant petition 
should be approved. 
In her decision the director found that the proffered position does not qualify as a specialty occupation. 
The director did not agree with the petitioner's categorization of the position as an administrative services 
SRC 04 001 50436 
Page 4 
manager, as described in the DOL Handbook. 
 The director found that the position fits within the 
Handbook's broad occupational category of purchasing managers, buyers, and purchasing agents, and 
cited information in the Handbook indicating that there are no uniform educational requirements for such 
positions. Referring to the letters from two other construction companies in Miami, the director declared 
that they were insufficient to establish an industry standard and that the requirement of a bachelor's 
degree in the broad field of business administration, without a particular specialty, would not meet the 
standard of a specialty occupation in any event. The director also found that the CIS memorandum on the 
adjudication of extension petitions is inapplicable because the instant petitioner is a new employer. The 
director concluded that the proffered position does not qualify as a specialty occupation under any of the 
criteria enumerated at 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). 
On appeal counsel asserts that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation under all four 
criteria of 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), and complains that the director's decision did not address the 
criteria. Supplementing the 20 job advertisements submitted earlier, which counsel points out were 
ignored by the director, an additional 40 job advertisements for contractor administrator positions have 
been submitted as evidence of a degree requirement for the proffered position. Counsel also submits an 
evaluation of the position's educational requirements from a university professor. According to counsel 
the DOL Handbook's entry on purchasing managers, buyers, and purchasing agents does not directly 
apply to the proffered position because the Handbook refers only to retail, wholesale, and manufacturing 
firms, whereas the petitioner's business is a construction company. In counsel's view, the job duties of a 
contract administrator for a construction company - which involve negotiating with subcontractors, 
analyzing the cost of labor, equipment and materials, other cost estimates, and ensuring the maintenance 
of contract standards - require more specialized knowledge than the job duties of a contract administrator 
for other types of companies. Counsel asserts that the director misinterpreted the Handbook's description 
of the educational requirements for the occupation, which range from a baccalaureate to a master's degree 
depending on the type of position. Though the director found that the proffered position was not that of 
an administrative services manager, counsel points to the sentence within that occupational category 
refemng to the educational requirements of a contract administrator as applicable to the proffered position 
and indicative that a bachelor's degree in business, human resources, or finance is required for the 
position. According to counsel, other DOL resources, including the Dictionary of Occupational Titles 
(DOT) and the O*NET confirm that a bachelor's degree is required for contract administrator positions. 
Lastly, counsel contends that a bachelor's degree in business administration is a specialty degree, and the 
employer's requirement of such a degree, even without a concentration in contract administration, would 
be sufficient to establish the proffered position as a specialty occupation. 
In determining whether a position meets the statutory and regulatory criteria of a specialty occupation, 
CIS routinely consults the DOL Handbook as an authoritative source of information about the duties and 
educational requirements of particular occupations. 
 Factors typically considered are whether the 
Handbook indicates a degree is required by the industry; whether the industry's professional association 
has made a degree a minimum entry requirement; and whether letters or affidavits from firms or 
individuals in the industry attest that such firms "routinely employ and recruit only degreed individuals." 
See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, 36 F.Supp. 2d 1151, 1165 (D.Minn. 1999) (quoting HirdIBlaker COT. v. Suva, 
764 F.Supp. 1095, 1102 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)). CIS also scrutinizes the specific duties and complexity of the 
position at issue, with the Handbook's occupational descriptions as a reference, as well as the petitioner's 
past hiring practices for the position. See Shanti, Inc. v. Reno, id., at 1165-66. 
SRC 04 001 50436 
Page 5 
The AAO determines that the proffered position does not fit within the Handbook's occupational category 
of purchasing managers, buyers, and purchasing agents. Workers in that occupation are employed by 
retail, wholesale, and manufacturing companies, not construction companies like the petitioner. The 
AAO agrees with the petitioner's original classification of the proffered position as a type of 
administrative services manager. The Handbook describes that occupation, in pertinent part, as follows: 
Administrative services managers . . . coordinate and direct support services to 
organizations as diverse as insurance companies, computer manufacturers, and 
government offices. These workers manage the many services that allow organizations 
to operate efficiently, such as secretarial and reception, administration, payroll, 
conference planning and travel, information and data processing, mail, materials 
scheduling and distribution, printing and reproduction, records management, 
telecommunications management, security, parking, and personal property procurement, 
supply, and disposal. 
In small organizations, a single administrative services manager may oversee all support 
services . . . . As the size of the firm increases, administrative services managers are more 
likely to specialize in specific support activities. For example, some administrative 
services managers work primarily as office managers, contract administrators, or 
unclaimed property officers . . . . 
[Aldministrative services managers who work as contract administrators oversee the 
preparation, analysis, negotiation, and review of contracts related to the purchase or sale 
of equipment, materials, supplies, products, or services . . . . 
Handbook, 2006-07 edition, at 25. 
 With respect to the educational requirements for administrative 
services managers, the Handbook states, in pertinent part, as follows: 
Educational requirements for these managers vary widely, depending on the size and 
complexity of the organization . . . . 
[Mlanagers of highly complex services, such as contract administration, generally need at 
least a bachelor's degree in business, human resources, or finance. Regardless of major, 
the curriculum should include courses in office technology, accounting, business 
mathematics, computer applications, human resources, and business law. 
Id. at 26. Based on the foregoing information, the AAO determines that the proffered position qualifies 
as a specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. 3 214,2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(l). 
To qualify to perform services in a specialty occupation, the beneficiary must meet one of the following 
criteria enumerated at 8 C.F.R. 3 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C): 
(I) 
 Hold a United States baccalaureate or higher degree required by the specialty 
occupation from an accredited college or university; 
SRC 04 001 50436 
Page 6 
(2) Hold a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a United States 
baccalaureate or higher degree required by the specialty occupation from an 
accredited college or university; 
(3) 
 Hold an unrestricted State license, registration or certification which authorizes 
him or her to fully practice the specialty occupation and be immediately engaged 
in that specialty in the state of intended employment; or 
(4) 
 Have education, specialized training, andlor progressively responsible experience 
that is equivalent to completion of a United States baccalaureate or higher degree 
in the specialty occupation, and have recognition of expertise in the specialty 
through progressively responsible positions directly related to the specialty. 
With respect to the beneficiary's qualifications for the proffered position in this case, the first evaluation 
report of the beneficiary's academic credentials from FIS declares that the diploma he received in 1986 
for the five years of coursework he completed at the Corporacion Universitaria de la Costa is equivalent 
to a bachelor's degree in business administration from an accredited U.S. college or university. The 
record includes the beneficiary's curriculum showing that his five-year program of business 
administration included sufficient specialization in coursework related to the field of contract 
administration to qualify the beneficiary to perform the services of the specialty occupation. 
Thus, the petitioner has demonstrated that the proffered position is a specialty occupation and that the 
beneficiary is qualified to perform the services of that occupation. The AAO will sustain the appeal and 
approve the petition. 
The petitioner bears the burden of proof in these proceedings. See section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1361. 
The petitioner has met that burden. 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is sustained. The petition is approved. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.