sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Data Analytics
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO, upon de novo review, concluded the petitioner had established the proffered position as a specialty occupation. The petitioner provided a detailed job description and other evidence showing the data scientist role was so complex or unique that it required at least a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 10093878 Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: AUG. 3, 2020 The Petitioner, a data analytics company, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a data scientist under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b ). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that proffered position is a specialty occupation . The matter is now before us on appeal. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. Section 291 of the Act; Matter of Chawathe, 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). Upon de nova review, we conclude that the Petitioner has established that the proffered position qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as defined by section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(i)(l), and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). The Petitioner provided a detailed job description that, along with other evidence in the record, establishes that the particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a bachelor's or higher degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, as required by the regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(2). Additionally, the record establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the proffered position by holding a qualifying degree from an accredited college or university in the United States. ORDER: The appeal is sustained.
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.